Non-Cochrane · other · PM42142200

Pituitary adenoma and intracerebral aneurysms: case series, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marino Picciola Valentino, Borghesi Michela, Trombin Vanessa, et al. · Pituitary · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1007/s11102-026-01690-w

Findings

25 findings

Population
Male patients with pituitary adenomaNone (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Prevalence of intracranial aneurysms
Male
Prevalence (proportion) 0.06 [0.04, 0.07]
GRADE not reported
1221 participants
Patients with pituitary adenomaNone (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Prevalence of intracranial aneurysms
Overall
Prevalence (proportion) 0.04 [0.02, 0.08]
GRADE not reported
10 studies · 5264 participants
Patients with pituitary adenoma (PA)Coexisting intracranial aneurysm (IA)NonePrevalence of multiple intracranial aneurysms among PA patients with an aneurysm
Hospital-based PA cohorts · Overall
Prevalence 0.18 [0.11, 0.27]
GRADE not reported
10 studies · 179 participants
Patients with pituitary adenomaNone (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Prevalence of intracranial aneurysms
Sex-specific estimates combined (male and female)
Prevalence (proportion) 0.07 [0.05, 0.08]
GRADE not reported
2647 participants
Female patients with pituitary adenomaNone (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Prevalence of intracranial aneurysms
Female
Prevalence (proportion) 0.08 [0.06, 0.09]
GRADE not reported
1426 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Non-functioning adenoma
Overall
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.405
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Age at aneurysm diagnosis
<=39 years
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.095
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Age at aneurysm diagnosis
>=70 years
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.122
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Previous brain radiotherapy
Overall
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.12
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Female sex
Overall
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.595
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Age at aneurysm diagnosis
60-69 years
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.27
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Age at aneurysm diagnosis
40-49 years
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.176
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Macroadenoma
Men
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.967
GRADE not reported
30 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)GH-secreting adenoma
Overall
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.311
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Previous cranial base surgery
Overall
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.15
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Gonadotropinoma
Overall
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.014
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Macroadenoma
Overall
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.919
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)ACTH-secreting adenoma
Overall
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.027
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Age at aneurysm diagnosis
50-59 years
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.338
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Aneurysm in cavernous segment of internal carotid artery (CS-ICA)
Overall
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.33
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Pituitary apoplexy
Overall
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.09
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Multiple intracranial aneurysms
Overall
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.135
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Aneurysm of anterior communicating artery (ACoA)
Overall
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.17
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)PRL-secreting adenoma
Overall
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.243
GRADE not reported
74 participants
Patients with coexisting pituitary adenoma and intracranial aneurysm (Group 1, individual patient data from case reports and series)None (single-group prevalence)None (single-group prevalence)Macroadenoma
Women
Proportion (descriptive, case-level pooling) 0.886
GRADE not reported
44 participants

Included primary studies 59

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Acqui M. et al., 1987
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Adachi K. et al., 1993
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Agarwal H. et al., 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Akutsu N. et al., 2014
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Almeida Silva JM et al., 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bulsara K. et al., 2007
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Choi HS.et al., 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Chuang C.C et al., 2006
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cifuentes-Lobelo H. et al., 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Curto L. et al., 2007
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fedder S. L. et al., 1990
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fookeerah P. & McLean M., 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fujiwara S. et al., 1991
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Giammusso V., 1960
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hermier M. et al., 1994
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hidenori E. et al., 2011
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Holdaway M. et al., 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hori T. et al., 1982
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Inoue H. et al., 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jakubowski J. 1978
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPrevalence of intracranial aneurysmsnot extracted yet
Jintao Hu, 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPrevalence of intracranial aneurysmsnot extracted yet
Keenan J. P. et al., 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Khachatryan T. et al., 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Khalsa S. S. et al., 2016
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lippman H. H. et al., 1971
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Manara R. et al., 2011
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPrevalence of intracranial aneurysmsnot extracted yet
Mangiardi J. R. et al., 1983
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Min Chul O. et al., 2012
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPrevalence of intracranial aneurysmsnot extracted yet
Mondragon-Soto M. G. et al., 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nadjem H. et al., 2007
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nakahara M et al., 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nene A. et al., 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nishijima Y. et al., 2010
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pant B. et al., 1997
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPrevalence of intracranial aneurysmsnot extracted yet
Pedrozo C. A. et al., 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rennert R. C et al., 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Revuelta R. et al., 2002
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sade B. et al., 2004
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Salpietro F. M. et al., 1997
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Satoru O. et al., 2012
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPrevalence of intracranial aneurysmsnot extracted yet
Satyarthee G. D. & Raheja A., 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Schenk V. W. & Solleveld H., 1968
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Seda L. Jr et al., 2008
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shahlaie K. et al., 2005
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Taiki S. et al., 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Taniguchi T. et al., 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Villalobos-Diaz R. et al., 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPrevalence of intracranial aneurysmsnot extracted yet
Wakai S. et al., 1979
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang CS et al., 2009
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang T et al., 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Xia X. et al., 2011
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Xin M. et al., 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPrevalence of intracranial aneurysmsnot extracted yet
Yamada S. et al., 2012
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yamashita S. et al., 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yang MY. et al., 2005
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yoshida M. et al., 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yoshikazu O. et al., 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPrevalence of intracranial aneurysmsnot extracted yet
Zatelli M. C. et al., 2004
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zheng H. et al., 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPrevalence of intracranial aneurysmsnot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with pituitary adenoma and coexisting intracranial aneurysm, any ageGroup 1: 74 patients with both PA and IA; Group 2: 5264 patients with PA from 10 studies
InterventionCoexisting intracranial aneurysm (condition of interest)Intracranial aneurysm (cavernous ICA most frequent site, 33%)
ComparisonNot specifiedNot specified
OutcomesClinical features of patients with both conditions; prevalence of IAs in PA patientsPooled IA prevalence among PA patients 4% (n=5264); male 6% (n=1221), female 8% (n=1426); multiple IAs 18% (n=179)
Study designsAny study design reporting cases or cohorts (case reports, case series, retrospective and cross-sectional studies); abstracts, reviews and editorials excludedCase reports, case series and prevalence studies (n=71)
TimingNot specifiedNot specified