Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41815628

Effects of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation on Endosseous Dental Implant Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Derbishi Ali A, Mubarki Ola, Hakami Razan M, et al. · Cureus · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.7759/cureus.103201

Findings

Population Patients receiving dental implants in augmented maxillary sinuses

6 findings

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA)None (single-arm pooled estimate)Implant failure rate
Follow-up 0.5 to 15 years (mean) · Meta-regression on mean follow-up duration (years)
Meta-regression slope 0.003
GRADE not reported
22 studies
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA)None (single-arm pooled estimate)Marginal bone loss (mm)
Not specified
Pooled mean 1.17 [0.59, 1.75]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
9 studies · 4502 participants
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA)None (single-arm pooled estimate)Implant failure rate
Follow-up 0.5 to 15 years (mean)
Pooled proportion 0.03 [0.02, 0.05]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
22 studies · 6860 participants
MSFA, lateral window (antrostomy)None (single-arm pooled estimate)Implant failure rate
Follow-up 0.5 to 15 years (mean) · Surgical technique: Lateral window approach
Pooled proportion 0.04 [0.02, 0.06]
GRADE not reported
11 studies · 3211 participants
MSFA, crestal (transalveolar, osteotome)None (single-arm pooled estimate)Implant failure rate
Follow-up 0.5 to 15 years (mean) · Surgical technique: Crestal (osteotome) approach
Pooled proportion 0.00 [0.00, 0.09]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 96 participants
MSFA, mixed lateral and crestalNone (single-arm pooled estimate)Implant failure rate
Follow-up 0.5 to 15 years (mean) · Surgical technique: Mixed approach
Pooled proportion 0.04 [0.01, 0.08]
GRADE not reported
9 studies · 3553 participants

Included primary studies 40

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Hashem 2023
Redox potentials in hydro-organic media at normal and subzero temperatures. Ferro-ferricyanide and cytochrome c as models.
PMID:202313
19781 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Pichotano 2019
Evaluation of L-PRF combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral for early implant placement after maxillary sinus augmentation: A…
PMID:30690860
20191 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Carmagnola 2024
Maxillary sinus lift augmentation: A randomized clinical trial with histological data comparing deproteinized bovine bone grafting vs…
DOI:10.1111/cid.13359
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Carmagnola 2024
Maxillary sinus lift augmentation: A randomized clinical trial with histological data comparing deproteinized bovine bone grafting vs…
PMID:38979855
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Erdem 2016
Three-Year Clinical and Radiographic Implant Follow-up in Sinus-Lifted Maxilla With Lateral Window Technique
DOI:10.1097/id.0000000000000360
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Erdem 2016
Three-Year Clinical and Radiographic Implant Follow-up in Sinus-Lifted Maxilla With Lateral Window Technique.
PMID:26579850
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Guljé 2014
Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm implants or by 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation…
PMID:25237669
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ha 2020
Clinical outcome of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinus via lateral approach: A 10-year follow-up study
DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.014
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ha 2020
Clinical outcome of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinus via lateral approach: A 10-year follow-up study.
PMID:32952884
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hallman 2005
A 3-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation…
DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2004.09.009
2005this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hallman 2005
A 3-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation…
PMID:15741036
2005this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hao 2021
[The relationships between different surgical approaches for maxillary sinus augmentation and implant failure and complications: a…
PMID:34109366
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jamcoski 2023
15‐Year Retrospective Study on the Success Rate of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation and Implants: Influence of Bone Substitute Type,…
DOI:10.1155/2023/9144661
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jamcoski 2023
15-Year Retrospective Study on the Success Rate of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation and Implants: Influence of Bone Substitute Type,…
PMID:36860810
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jue 2025
Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With Autogenous Bone Versus Bovine Bone Mineral Mixed With 25% Autogenous Bone: A 1‐Year Multicenter,…
DOI:10.1111/clr.14431
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jue 2025
Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With Autogenous Bone Versus Bovine Bone Mineral Mixed With 25% Autogenous Bone: A 1-Year Multicenter,…
PMID:40095360
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jurisic 2008
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report
DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.025
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jurisic 2008
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report.
PMID:18602304
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Khouly 2017
Long-Term Implant Survival After 100 Maxillary Sinus Augmentations Using Plasma Rich in Growth Factors
DOI:10.1097/id.0000000000000561
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Khouly 2017
Long-Term Implant Survival After 100 Maxillary Sinus Augmentations Using Plasma Rich in Growth Factors.
PMID:28207599
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kim HJ 2020
A retrospective study of implants placed following 1‐stage or 2‐stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation by the lateral window technique…
DOI:10.1002/jper.19-0066
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kim HJ 2020
A retrospective study of implants placed following 1-stage or 2-stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation by the lateral window technique…
PMID:31372997
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kim YK 2013
Relationship Between Prognosis of Dental Implants and Maxillary Sinusitis Associated with the Sinus Elevation Procedure
DOI:10.11607/jomi.2739
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kim YK 2013
Relationship between prognosis of dental implants and maxillary sinusitis associated with the sinus elevation procedure.
PMID:23377064
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Krennmair 2019
Implant health and factors affecting peri‐implant marginal bone alteration for implants placed in staged maxillary sinus augmentation: A…
DOI:10.1111/cid.12684
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Krennmair 2019
Implant health and factors affecting peri-implant marginal bone alteration for implants placed in staged maxillary sinus augmentation: A…
PMID:30609163
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lie 2021
Implant survival after graftless sinus floor augmentation in highly atrophic maxillae: a randomized controlled trial in a split mouth study
DOI:10.1186/s40729-021-00387-y
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lie 2021
Implant survival after graftless sinus floor augmentation in highly atrophic maxillae: a randomized controlled trial in a split mouth study.
PMID:34661774
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Liu 2019
Immediate implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing…
DOI:10.1111/cid.12783
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Liu 2019
Immediate implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing…
PMID:31044510
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Olson 2000
Long‐Term Assessment (5 to 71 Months) of Endosseous Dental Implants Placed in the Augmented Maxillary Sinus
DOI:10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.152
2000this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Olson 2000
Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
PMID:11885175
2000this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pichotano 2019
Evaluation of L‐PRF combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral for early implant placement after maxillary sinus augmentation: A…
DOI:10.1111/cid.12713
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sağlanmak 2025
Dental Implant Rehabilitation of Posterior Maxillary Edentulism via Sinus Augmentation Using the Lateral Window Technique: A Retrospective…
PMID:39997599
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tetsch 2010
Long‐term results after lateral and osteotome technique sinus floor elevation: a retrospective analysis of 2190 implants over a time…
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01661.x
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tetsch 2010
Long-term results after lateral and osteotome technique sinus floor elevation: a retrospective analysis of 2190 implants over a time…
PMID:20443802
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Uckan 2011
Survival Rates of Implants Inserted in the Maxillary Sinus Area by Internal or External Approach
DOI:10.1097/id.0b013e3182386d34
2011this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Uckan 2011
Survival rates of implants inserted in the maxillary sinus area by internal or external approach.
PMID:22051745
2011this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2024
Clinical outcomes and risk factor analysis of dental implants inserted with lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A 3‐ to 8‐year…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13947
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2024
Clinical outcomes and risk factor analysis of dental implants inserted with lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A 3- to 8-year…
PMID:38246602
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with endosseous dental implants placed in augmented maxillary sinuses; studies of zygomatic or pterygoid implants excludedPatients with implants in augmented maxillary sinuses (6,860 implants, n=22 studies)
InterventionMaxillary sinus floor augmentation (lateral window, crestal/osteotome, mixed approaches; graft materials)Lateral window (n=11), crestal (n=2) and mixed (n=9) approaches per Figure 6
ComparisonLateral window versus crestal approach; graft typeNo comparator (single-arm pooled proportions); subgroup comparison of surgical techniques
OutcomesImplant failure rate (primary); marginal bone loss (secondary)Implant failure rate (n=22); marginal bone loss (n=9)
Study designsRCTs and prospective or retrospective cohort studies7 RCTs and 15 cohort studies (1 prospective, 14 retrospective)
TimingMinimum follow-up of one year post-loadingMean follow-up 0.5 to 15 years

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesPartial Yesno
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailNoPartial Yesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: NoNRSI: No · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes