Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41584371

Interventions to Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Induced Oral Mucositis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Pereira Cristiana Palmela, Marques Inês, Martins João Paulo · Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2025 · PubMed · doi:10.15644/asc59/4/6

Findings

Population Adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy

49 findings

Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Age: 44-55 years
OR 0.33 [0.1, 1.1]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Oral mucositis scale: RTOG
OR 0.38 [0.07, 2.13]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Region: South America
OR 0.68 [0.21, 2.22]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Treatment regimen: radiotherapy (RT)
OR 0.28 [0.15, 0.53]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Sex: %Female >35%
MD -0.57 [-0.86, -0.28]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Cancer type: Other
MD -0.17 [-0.37, 0.03]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Age: 44-55 years
MD -0.48 [-0.8, -0.16]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Oral mucositis scale: NCI-CTCAE
MD -0.76 [-0.98, -0.54]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Oral mucositis scale: WHO
OR 0.33 [0.2, 0.53]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Oral mucositis scale: WHO
MD -0.43 [-0.78, -0.09]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Sex: %Female >=25%
OR 0.22 [0.12, 0.42]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Oral mucositis scale: NCI-CTCAE
OR 0.27 [0.17, 0.42]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Sex: %Female <=35%
MD -0.49 [-0.9, -0.08]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Age: 56-67 years
MD -0.5 [-0.77, -0.23]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Treatment regimen: chemoradiotherapy (CRT)
MD -0.42 [-0.71, -0.12]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Cancer type: Head and neck
MD -0.52 [-0.81, -0.23]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Region: South Asia
MD -0.49 [-1.06, 0.07]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Sensitivity analysis excluding high risk of bias studies
OR 0.33 [0.17, 0.65]
GRADE not reported
15 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Region: East and South Asia
OR 0.08 [0.03, 0.27]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Treatment regimen: radiotherapy (RT)
MD -0.84 [-1.32, -0.35]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Region: Middle East and North Africa
MD -0.37 [-0.62, -0.13]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Region: South Asia
OR 0.39 [0.19, 0.83]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries
OR 0.31 [0.19, 0.49]
GRADE not reported
20 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Treatment regimen: chemotherapy (CT)
OR 0.27 [0.16, 0.47]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Treatment regimen: chemotherapy (CT)
MD -0.26 [-0.62, 0.11]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Treatment regimen: chemoradiotherapy (CRT)
OR 0.34 [0.17, 0.68]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries
MD -0.47 [-0.71, -0.24]
GRADE not reported
16 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Region: East and South Asia
MD -0.65 [-1.11, -0.18]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Region: USA
OR 0.31 [0.19, 0.51]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Region: South America
MD -0.41 [-0.88, 0.06]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Age: 56-67 years
OR 0.36 [0.23, 0.58]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for oral mucositisControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Sex: %Female <25%
OR 0.41 [0.23, 0.74]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and coating agentsControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Intervention groups
MD -0.26 [-0.82, 0.31]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and coating agentsControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Intervention groups
OR 0.44 [0.24, 0.8]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Natural agents (honey, curcumin, green tea, probiotics and others)Control (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Intervention groups
MD -0.51 [-0.81, -0.2]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Natural agents (honey, curcumin, green tea, probiotics and others)Control (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Intervention groups
OR 0.26 [0.12, 0.54]
GRADE not reported
11 studies
Non-pharmacological interventions (cryotherapy, photobiomodulation, early nutrition)Control (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Intervention type
MD -0.56 [-0.98, -0.14]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Non-pharmacological interventions (cryotherapy, photobiomodulation, early nutrition)Control (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Intervention groups
OR 0.21 [0.1, 0.45]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Non-pharmacological interventions (cryotherapy, photobiomodulation, early nutrition)Control (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Intervention groups
MD -0.56 [-0.98, -0.14]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Non-pharmacological interventions (cryotherapy, photobiomodulation, early nutrition)Control (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Intervention type
OR 0.26 [0.13, 0.5]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Pharmacological interventionsControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Intervention type
OR 0.32 [0.18, 0.55]
GRADE not reported
16 studies
Pharmacological interventionsControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Intervention type
MD -0.45 [-0.72, -0.18]
GRADE not reported
13 studies
Capsule or pill delivered interventionsControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Delivery method
MD -0.73 [-1.04, -0.42]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Capsule or pill delivered interventionsControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Delivery method
OR 0.27 [0.17, 0.43]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Topical non-pharmacological interventionsControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Delivery method
MD -0.56 [-0.98, -0.14]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Topical non-pharmacological interventionsControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Delivery method
OR 0.26 [0.13, 0.5]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Topical pharmacological interventions (mouthwashes, gels)Control (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Delivery method
OR 0.42 [0.18, 1.01]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Topical pharmacological interventions (mouthwashes, gels)Control (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis severity (mucositis scale score)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Delivery method
MD -0.36 [-0.72, 0.0]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Intravenously delivered interventionsControl (placebo, routine oral care, no treatment, or active comparator)Oral mucositis (dichotomous: incidence/severity grade)
Post-baseline follow-up (one or several timepoints) · Oncology patients, mainly head and neck cancer, 11 countries · Delivery method
OR 0.17 [0.06, 0.5]
GRADE not reported
4 studies

Included primary studies 45

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Azrudheen 2023
Effectiveness of Application / of Flavored (Honey and Tulsi) Ice Chips on Reduction of Oral Mucositis Among Chemo Therapy Receiving Patients
DOI:10.18137/cardiometry.2023.26.690695
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Banega 2023
Modulation of radiant oncological therapy through the intervention with substances of vegetable origin
DOI:10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2261
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bonomi 2023
PREVLAR: Phase 2a Randomized Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of RRx-001 in the Attenuation of Oral Mucositis in Patients Receiving…
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.031
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bonomi 2023
PREVLAR: Phase 2a Randomized Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of RRx-001 in the Attenuation of Oral Mucositis in Patients Receiving…
PMID:36646388
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Chin 2023
Efficacy of polyacrylate silver salt/polyvinylpyrrolidone-based liquid oral gel in management of concurrence chemoradiotherapy-induced…
DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2022.12.007
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Chin 2023
Efficacy of polyacrylate silver salt/polyvinylpyrrolidone-based liquid oral gel in management of concurrence chemoradiotherapy-induced…
PMID:36623972
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
ChunLing 2019
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics to reduce the severity of oral mucositis induced by chemoradiotherapy…
PMID:30521105
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
de Cassia 2022
Comparative randomized trial study about the efficacy of photobiomodulation and curcumin antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as a…
PMID:35608694
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
de Cassia Dias Viana Andrade 2022
Comparative randomized trial study about the efficacy of photobiomodulation and curcumin antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as a…
DOI:10.1007/s00520-022-07127-x
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Delavarian 2019
Oral administration of nanomicelle curcumin in the prevention of radiotherapy‐induced mucositis in head and neck cancers
DOI:10.1111/scd.12358
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Delavarian 2019
Oral administration of nanomicelle curcumin in the prevention of radiotherapy-induced mucositis in head and neck cancers.
PMID:30761565
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fernandes 2022
Brazilian organic propolis for prevention and treatment of radiation-related oral acute toxicities in head and neck cancer patients: A…
DOI:10.3389/fphar.2022.973255
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fernandes 2022
Brazilian organic propolis for prevention and treatment of radiation-related oral acute toxicities in head and neck cancer patients: A…
PMID:36278178
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Habsari 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hasheminasab 2020
Effects of a Plantago ovata-based herbal compound in prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in patients with breast cancer receiving…
DOI:10.1016/j.joim.2020.02.008
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hasheminasab 2020
Effects of a Plantago ovata-based herbal compound in prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in patients with breast cancer receiving…
PMID:32268991
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jiang (ChunLing) 2019
A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of probiotics to reduce the severity of oral mucositis induced by chemoradiotherapy…
DOI:10.1002/cncr.31907
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kaur 2024
A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TOPICAL APPLICATION OF HONEY ON ORAL MUCOSITIS AMONG HEAD AND NECK CANCER…
DOI:10.47211/idcij.2024.v11i01.002
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kia 2021
Effects of nanomicelle curcumin capsules on prevention and treatment of oral mucosits in patients under chemotherapy with or without head…
DOI:10.1186/s12906-021-03400-4
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kia 2021
Effects of nanomicelle curcumin capsules on prevention and treatment of oral mucosits in patients under chemotherapy with or without head…
PMID:34521398
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kurane 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lopes 2021
Cost-effectiveness randomized clinical trial on the effect of photobiomodulation therapy for prevention of radiotherapy-induced severe…
PMID:32621262
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lopes 2023
Effects of a mucoadhesive phytomedicine (Curcuma longa L. and Bidens pilosa L.) on radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis and quality of life…
PMID:37566179
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lopes Martins 2021
Cost-effectiveness randomized clinical trial on the effect of photobiomodulation therapy for prevention of radiotherapy-induced severe…
DOI:10.1007/s00520-020-05607-6
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Martins 2023
Effects of a mucoadhesive phytomedicine (Curcuma longa L. and Bidens pilosa L.) on radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis and quality of life…
DOI:10.1007/s00520-023-07971-5
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mirza 2022
Efficacy of Bacillus clausii UBBC - 07 spores in the amelioration of oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation…
DOI:10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100523
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mirza 2022
Efficacy of Bacillus clausii UBBC - 07 spores in the amelioration of oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation…
PMID:35101832
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pakravan 2019
A novel formulation for radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis: Triamcinolone acetonide mucoadhesive film.
PMID:31523249
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ravindra 2019
Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine vs KMnO<sub>4</sub> Oral care on Oral mucositis among Head and neck cancer patients admitted in Oncology…
DOI:10.5958/2454-2660.2019.00011.5
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Saniya 2023
Evaluating Ayurvedic mouthwash and soda-salt mouthwash for oral mucositis in head and neck cancer: A randomized controlled trial
DOI:10.1016/j.jaim.2023.100829
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Saniya 2023
Evaluating Ayurvedic mouthwash and soda-salt mouthwash for oral mucositis in head and neck cancer: A randomized controlled trial.
PMID:38029523
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Selvi 2019
A Study to assess the effectiveness of normal saline mouthwash on the prevention of Oral Mucositis among patients receiving chemotherapy…
DOI:10.5958/2454-2660.2019.00009.7
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Serageldin 2023
The Effect of Metformin on Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicities in Non-diabetic Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomised Controlled Study
DOI:10.1007/s40264-023-01305-4
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Serageldin 2023
The Effect of Metformin on Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicities in Non-diabetic Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomised Controlled Study.
PMID:37131014
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shaolong 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shin 2019
The Effects of Oral Cryotherapy on Oral Mucositis, Reactive Oxygen Series, Inflammatory Cytokines, and Oral Comfort in Gynecologic Cancer…
DOI:10.4040/jkan.2019.49.2.149
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shin 2019
[The Effects of Oral Cryotherapy on Oral Mucositis, Reactive Oxygen Series, Inflammatory Cytokines, and Oral Comfort in Gynecologic Cancer…
PMID:31064968
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Srinivasan 2019 (benzydamine)
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Srinivasan 2019 (clotrimazole)
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Srinivasan 2019a
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Srinivasan 2019b
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Thomas 2023
Randomized Control Study of the Effects of Turmeric Mouthwash on Oral Health Status, Treatment-Induced Mucositis, and Associated Oral…
DOI:10.1097/ncc.0000000000001149
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Thomas 2023
Randomized Control Study of the Effects of Turmeric Mouthwash on Oral Health Status, Treatment-Induced Mucositis, and Associated Oral…
PMID:36066336
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wei 2024
Effects of early nutritional intervention on oral mucositis and basic conditions in patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck…
DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2024.05.029
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wei 2024
Effects of early nutritional intervention on oral mucositis and basic conditions in patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck…
PMID:38833872
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (18 years or older) with cancer undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, with oral mucositis of varying severity (WHO, NCI-CTCAE, RTOG)Adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (1,499 participants; 30 studies from 27 publications; 11 countries; mostly head and neck cancer)
InterventionAny pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention for prevention or treatment of oral mucositis (MASCC/ISOO categories: basic oral care, growth factors and cytokines, anti-inflammatory agents, antimicrobials, analgesics and anesthetics, mucosal coating agents, natural agents, cryotherapy, photobiomodulation/laser, amifostine)Natural agents (honey, green tea, probiotics, curcumin, vitamin E, herbal compounds, ayurvedic and saline mouthwash, compound Kushen); anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and coating agents (RRx-001 with dexamethasone, polyacrylate silver salt, triamcinolone, chlorhexidine, metformin, clotrimazole, benzydamine); non-pharmacological (cryotherapy, photobiomodulation, early nutritional intervention)
ComparisonPlacebo, standard/routine care, no treatment, or head-to-head comparison between interventionsPlacebo, routine oral care, no intervention, active comparators (e.g., nystatin, benzydamine, KMnO4, saline, soda bicarbonate mouthwash)
OutcomesPrimary: oral mucositis incidence and severity (any, moderate-to-severe, severe). Secondary: pain intensity, time to onset, remission of mucositisOral mucositis severity (mucositis scale, mean difference; 16 studies) and oral mucositis dichotomous (odds ratio; 20 studies)
Study designsRandomized controlled trialsRandomized controlled trials (27 publications, 30 studies/arms)
TimingNot specifiedPost-baseline follow-up: 1 to 16 time points per study

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalNoNoyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: No · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Nono
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsYesYesyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalNoNoyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes