Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41578906

Adverse events of oral analgesics after third molar extraction: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Magesty R-A, de-Souza G-M, Fernandes I-A, et al. · Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.4317/medoral.27956

Findings

Population Patients with moderate to severe pain after lower third molar extraction under local anesthesia

10 findings

Non opioid analgesicPlaceboAny adverse event related to medication use before discharge
Up to hospital discharge · Single-dose oral analgesic after lower third molar surgery under local anesthesia
RR 1.49 [0.87, 2.55]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Non opioid analgesic plus OpioidPlaceboAny adverse event related to medication use before discharge
Up to hospital discharge · Single-dose oral analgesic after lower third molar surgery under local anesthesia
RR 1.71 [1.05, 2.77]
Low
Studies not reported
NSAID plus Non opioid analgesicPlaceboAny adverse event related to medication use before discharge
Up to hospital discharge · Single-dose oral analgesic after lower third molar surgery under local anesthesia
RR 1.06 [0.31, 3.64]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
NSAID plus Non opioid analgesic plus OpioidPlaceboAny adverse event related to medication use before discharge
Up to hospital discharge · Single-dose oral analgesic after lower third molar surgery under local anesthesia
RR 2.41 [0.94, 6.17]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
NSAIDsPlaceboAny adverse event related to medication use before discharge
Up to hospital discharge · Single-dose oral analgesic after lower third molar surgery under local anesthesia
RR 0.95 [0.69, 1.31]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Opioid analgesicPlaceboAny adverse event related to medication use before discharge
Up to hospital discharge · Single-dose oral analgesic after lower third molar surgery under local anesthesia
RR 1.69 [0.9, 3.17]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Opioid plus NSAIDPlaceboAny adverse event related to medication use before discharge
Up to hospital discharge · Single-dose oral analgesic after lower third molar surgery under local anesthesia
RR 1.76 [0.99, 3.15]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
NSAIDsNon opioid analgesicAny adverse event related to medication use before discharge
Up to hospital discharge · Single-dose oral analgesic after lower third molar surgery under local anesthesia
RR 1.82 [1.24, 2.68]
Low
Studies not reported
NSAIDsNon opioid analgesic plus OpioidAny adverse event related to medication use before discharge
Up to hospital discharge · Single-dose oral analgesic after lower third molar surgery under local anesthesia
RR 1.42 [1.03, 1.96]
Low
Studies not reported
Opioid analgesicNSAIDsAny adverse event related to medication use before discharge
Up to hospital discharge · Single-dose oral analgesic after lower third molar surgery under local anesthesia
RR 0.61 [0.41, 0.89]
Very low
Studies not reported

Included primary studies 39

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Ahlstrom 1993
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bakshi 1992
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bakshi 1994
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Breivik 1999
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Clark 1989
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Desjardins 1983
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Frame 1986
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fricke 2002
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gay-Escoda 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Goldstein 1994
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Haglund and Bültzingslöwen 2006
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hill 2001
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hill 2006
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jackson 2004
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jones 1997
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jung 2004
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Litkowski 2005
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Macleod 2002
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
McQuay 1996
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Moller 2008
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Moore 1998
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Moore 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Olson 1996
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Olson 2001
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Planas 1998
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Puigvert 1990
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Quiding 1993
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ragot 1993
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rowe 1985
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Schleier 2007
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Schou 1998
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sunshine 1983
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sunshine 1986
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Varner 2009
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Weiser 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yamashita 2014
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yeung 2003
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Young 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zuniga 2010
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with moderate to severe pain after lower third molar extraction under local anesthesiaPatients after third molar surgery (n=5306 surgeries)
InterventionAnti-inflammatory drugs and/or analgesics, any dose, single oral doseMonotherapies (non opioid analgesic, NSAIDs, opioid) and combinations (non opioid plus opioid, NSAID plus non opioid, NSAID plus non opioid plus opioid, opioid plus NSAID)
ComparisonPlacebo, other oral medications, or same drug at different single dosesPlacebo (n=1078; 23 RCTs) and active comparators
OutcomesAdverse events related to medication use reported up to dischargeAny adverse event before discharge (28 RCTs in network meta-analysis)
Study designsParallel, cross-over or split-mouth RCTsRCTs (n=40 included; n=28 in network meta-analysis)
TimingUp to dischargeUp to discharge

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes