Non-Cochrane · prognostic · PM41562911

Computational Stemness and Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review, Dual Meta-Analysis, and Functional Meta-Synthesis.

Ardila Carlos M, Pineda-Vélez Eliana, Vivares-Builes Anny M · Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025 · PubMed · doi:10.3390/medsci14010021

Findings

Population Adults with histologically confirmed oral squamous cell carcinoma

4 findings

High computational stemness signature or risk score (mRNAsi, lncRNA, multigene, CpG signatures)Low stemness signature or risk scoreOverall survival
Main analysis (k = 6)
HR 2.24 [1.61, 3.12]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
6 studies
High computational stemness signature or risk score (mRNAsi, lncRNA, multigene, CpG signatures)Low stemness signature or risk scoreOverall survival
Sensitivity: excluding Shi et al. (KM-derived unadjusted HR) (k = 5)
HR 2.13 [1.56, 2.89]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
CSC-positive immunophenotype by tissue immunohistochemistry (CD44, CD133, xCT/SLC7A11)CSC-negative or low immunophenotypeOverall survival
Main analysis (k = 2)
HR 2.01 [1.42, 2.84]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
2 studies
CSC-positive immunophenotype by tissue immunohistochemistry (CD44, CD133, xCT/SLC7A11)CSC-negative or low immunophenotypeOverall survival
Exploratory sensitivity: adding Ortiz et al. 1-year HR (k = 3)
HR 0.77 [0.16, 3.81]
GRADE not reported
3 studies

Included primary studies 20

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Feng 2021
Characterization of Cancer Stem Cell Characteristics and Development of a Prognostic Stemness Index Cell-Related Signature in Oral…
DOI:10.1155/2021/1571421
2021this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Feng 2021
Characterization of Cancer Stem Cell Characteristics and Development of a Prognostic Stemness Index Cell-Related Signature in Oral…
PMID:34840626
2021this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Gotz 2018
ALDH1 as a prognostic marker for lymph node metastasis in OSCC
DOI:10.3892/br.2018.1131
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gotz 2018
ALDH1 as a prognostic marker for lymph node metastasis in OSCC.
PMID:30233780
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lee 2018
Overexpression of cysteine‐glutamate transporter and CD44 for prediction of recurrence and survival in patients with oral cavity squamous…
DOI:10.1002/hed.25331
2018this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Lee 2018
Overexpression of cysteine-glutamate transporter and CD44 for prediction of recurrence and survival in patients with oral cavity squamous…
PMID:30303590
2018this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Lohavanichbutr 2013
A 13-Gene Signature Prognostic of HPV-Negative OSCC: Discovery and External Validation
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-2647
2013this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Lohavanichbutr 2013
A 13-gene signature prognostic of HPV-negative OSCC: discovery and external validation.
PMID:23319825
2013this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Oliveira 2014
CD44+/CD133+ immunophenotype and matrix metalloproteinase-9: Influence on prognosis in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma.
PMID:24178866
2014this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Ortiz 2024
CSChighE-cadherinlow immunohistochemistry panel predicts poor prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma
DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-55594-5
2024this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Ortiz 2024
CSChighE-cadherinlow immunohistochemistry panel predicts poor prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
PMID:38719848
2024this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Rao 2020
Prognostic Significance of ALDH1, Bmi1, and OCT4 Expression in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
DOI:10.1177/1073274820904959
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rao 2020
Prognostic Significance of ALDH1, Bmi1, and OCT4 Expression in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
PMID:32951453
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shen 2017
Seven-CpG-based prognostic signature coupled with gene expression predicts survival of oral squamous cell carcinoma
DOI:10.1186/s13148-017-0392-9
2017this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Shen 2017
Seven-CpG-based prognostic signature coupled with gene expression predicts survival of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
PMID:28852427
2017this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Shi 2024
Identification and Validation of a Prognostic Signature Derived from the Cancer Stem Cells for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
DOI:10.3390/ijms25021031
2024this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Shi 2024
Identification and Validation of a Prognostic Signature Derived from the Cancer Stem Cells for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
PMID:38256104
2024this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Xu 2022
Development of a lncRNA-based prognostic signature for oral squamous cell carcinoma.
PMID:35100473
2022this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Yu 2022
Identification and Validation of HOTAIRM1 as a Novel Biomarker for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2021.798584
2022this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet
Yu 2022
Identification and Validation of HOTAIRM1 as a Novel Biomarker for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
PMID:35087800
2021this review onlyOverall survivalnot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults with histologically confirmed OSCCAdults with OSCC (11 studies)
InterventionComputational stemness models from omic data; CSC immunomarkers by IHCComputational stemness signatures (n=6 studies); CSC-IHC markers (n=3 studies, 2 pooled; 2 further narrative only)
ComparisonHigh vs low stemness risk or biomarker expression by study-defined thresholdsHigh vs low stemness/risk; CSC-positive vs negative
OutcomesOverall survival (primary); disease-specific and recurrence-free survival (secondary)Overall survival pooled (6 computational; 2 CSC-IHC); DSS/RFS not pooled
Study designsHuman cohort studies (retrospective or prospective), including public OSCC dataset analysesCohort studies; 11 included, 9 in meta-analysis
TimingNot specifiedNot specified