Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41492762

Analgesic Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy for Postoperative Endodontic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bonacina Gabriela, Hartmann Rafael Chies, Gomes Maximiliano Schünke, et al. · Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1111/aej.70052

Findings

3 findings

Population
Patients undergoing root canal treatmentLow-level laser therapy (LLLT)Control (placebo, no laser or ibuprofen)Postoperative endodontic pain intensity (VAS)
1 day (24 h) · Root canal treatment · Overall
MD -0.56 [-0.74, -0.38]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness
5 studies · 310 participants
Teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (vital pulp)Low-level laser therapy (LLLT)Control (placebo, no laser or ibuprofen)Postoperative endodontic pain intensity (VAS)
1 day (24 h) · Root canal treatment · Vital pulp (pulpitis)
MD -0.51 [-0.71, -0.32]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 180 participants
Teeth with necrotic pulp and asymptomatic apical periodontitisLow-level laser therapy (LLLT)Control (placebo or no laser)Postoperative endodontic pain intensity (VAS)
1 day (24 h) · Root canal treatment · Necrotic pulp (asymptomatic apical periodontitis)
MD -1.03 [-2.02, -0.03]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 130 participants

Included primary studies 9

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Doganay Yildiz 2018
Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Postoperative Pain in Molars with Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Placebo-controlled…
PMID:30144985
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Guimaraes 2021
Effect of photobiomodulation on post-operative symptoms in teeth with asymptomatic apical periodontitis treated with foraminal…
PMID:34173988
2021this review onlyPostoperative endodontic pain intensity (VAS)not extracted yet
Ismail 2023
Efficiency of diode laser in control of post-endodontic pain: a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:36662285
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kaplan 2021
Effect of a 980-nm diode laser on post-operative pain after endodontic treatment in teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized clinical…
PMID:33482797
2021this review onlyPostoperative endodontic pain intensity (VAS)not extracted yet
Lopes 2019
Effect of photobiomodulation therapy on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment: a randomized, controlled, clinical study.
PMID:29658070
2019this review onlyPostoperative endodontic pain intensity (VAS)not extracted yet
Naseri 2020
Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy With Different Locations of Irradiation on Postoperative Endodontic Pain in Patients With Symptomatic…
PMID:32802283
2020this review onlyPostoperative endodontic pain intensity (VAS)not extracted yet
Nunes 2020
Comparison of the effect of photobiomodulation therapy and Ibuprofen on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment: randomized,…
PMID:31811497
2020this review onlyPostoperative endodontic pain intensity (VAS)not extracted yet
Saglam 2023
Comparison of ıntracanal ozone and low-level laser therapy on postoperative pain in vital teeth with symptomatic apical…
PMID:37776342
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shah 2022
Evaluation of effect of low level laser therapy with intracanal medicament on periapical healing: A randomised control trial.
PMID:35229767
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients undergoing root canal treatmentPatients with asymptomatic or symptomatic apical periodontitis or symptomatic irreversible pulpitis undergoing root canal treatment (n=9 studies; sample sizes 42 to 180)
InterventionLow-level laser therapyLLLT (InGaAlP, GaAlAs or diode lasers; 660 to 980 nm; 40 to 160 s) (n=9 studies)
ComparisonAnalgesic/anti-inflammatory medication or placeboNo laser/placebo (n=8 studies); ibuprofen (n=1 study)
OutcomesPostoperative endodontic pain levels (VAS, VRS or NRS)Postoperative pain intensity by VAS (n=7), VRS and NRS (n=2)
Study designsClinical trialsRandomised clinical trials (n=9)
Timing1 day (24 h) for meta-analysisPain at 6 h to 30 days; meta-analysis at 24 h

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallLowLowyes