Non-Cochrane · prognostic · PM41469883
Outcomes of dental autotransplantation in relation to dental root formation. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rowland Hugo George, Ferrer Molina Marcela, Hijazi Alsadi Tawfiq, et al. · Biomedical engineering online · 2025 · PubMed · doi:10.1186/s12938-025-01450-0
Findings
Population Patients receiving dental autotransplantation (DAT) to replace a lost or hopeless single tooth
84 findings
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Pulp necrosis rate association with follow-up duration (meta-regression) Duration of follow-up Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row. | Duration of follow-up associated with pulp necrosis rate (p = 0.057) GRADE not reported 9 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Survival rate at 5 years (average) 5 years | Pooled rate (%) 95.2 GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Survival rate at 6 months and 1 year (average) 6 months and 1 year | Pooled rate (%) 97.7 GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Pulp necrosis rate | Pooled rate (%) 6.4 GRADE not reported 9 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Survival rate at 10 years (average) 10 years | Pooled rate (%) 94.0 GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Ankylosis rate | Pooled rate (%) 4.4 GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Overall survival rate of transplanted teeth Mean follow-up 1 to 15 years across studies | Pooled rate (%) 93.8 [90.2, 97.3] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Infection-related root resorption rate | Pooled rate (%) 6.3 GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Success rate of transplanted teeth | Pooled rate (%) 84.0 [77.9, 90.2] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Survival rate at 6 months and 1 year (average) 6 months and 1 year | Pooled rate (%) 94.0 GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Survival rate at 5 years (average) 5 years | Pooled rate (%) 92.9 GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Survival rate at 10 years (average) 10 years | Pooled rate (%) 83.8 GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Overall survival rate of transplanted teeth Mean follow-up 1 to 15 years across studies | Pooled rate (%) 92.6 [87.1, 98.0] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Ankylosis rate | Pooled rate (%) 6.7 GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Success rate of transplanted teeth | Pooled rate (%) 86.7 [80.3, 93.2] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Infection-related root resorption rate | Pooled rate (%) 5.9 GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Pulp necrosis rate | None of the selected articles reported pulp necrosis rate in the closed apex group; no meta-analysis possible No studies found 0 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Infection-related root resorption rate | Mixed-effects meta-regression with group (open vs closed apex) as moderator: p = 0.878; no significant difference GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Success rate | Mixed-effects meta-regression with group (open vs closed apex) as moderator: p = 0.539; no significant difference GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Pulp necrosis rate Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row. | Planned comparison not possible: no closed apex study reported pulp necrosis No studies found 0 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Ankylosis rate | Mixed-effects meta-regression with group (open vs closed apex) as moderator: p = 0.425; no significant difference GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Overall survival rate | Mixed-effects meta-regression with group (open vs closed apex) as moderator: p = 0.833; no significant difference GRADE not reported Studies not reported |
| DAT (open and closed apex combined) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Overall survival rate of transplanted teeth | Pooled rate (%) 93.2 [90.2, 96.3] GRADE not reported 26 studies |
| DAT (open and closed apex combined) | None (single-group pooled rate) | Success rate of transplanted teeth | Pooled rate (%) 85.4 [81.1, 89.8] GRADE not reported 22 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Splinting duration (per week) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.060 [-0.072, -0.047] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Recipient site molar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.009 [-0.142, 0.125] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Splint: orthodontic wire (Ortho) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.032 [-0.075, 0.138] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Occlusal seating (vs infra-occlusion) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.067 [0.002, 0.133] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Splint: wire composite splint (WCS) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.142 [-0.235, -0.049] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Age | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.009 [-0.020, 0.002] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Donor tooth premolar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.013 [-0.196, 0.169] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Pre-orthodontic force on donor tooth (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.080 [0.007, 0.153] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Donor tooth anterior (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.007 [-0.149, 0.135] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Splint: wire composite splint (WCS) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.011 [-0.088, 0.067] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Recipient site molar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.058 [-0.132, 0.016] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Recipient site anterior (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.032 [-0.039, 0.104] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor 3D printed replica of donor tooth (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.144 [0.072, 0.216] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Donor tooth molar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.085 [-0.201, 0.032] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Follow-up (years) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.000 [-0.009, 0.009] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Donor tooth molar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.080 [-0.135, -0.024] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Occlusal seating (vs infra-occlusion) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.095 [-0.016, 0.206] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Splinting duration (per week) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.010 [-0.024, 0.004] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Recipient site premolar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.007 [-0.138, 0.124] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Splint: orthodontic wire (Ortho) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.158 [-0.337, 0.021] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor 3D printed replica of donor tooth (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.052 [-0.018, 0.122] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Pre-orthodontic force on donor tooth (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.153 [0.090, 0.217] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Recipient site premolar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.057 [-0.127, 0.012] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Donor tooth premolar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.063 [-0.015, 0.140] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Age | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.003 [-0.027, 0.022] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Follow-up (years) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.014 [-0.028, -0.001] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Donor tooth anterior (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.013 [-0.073, 0.098] GRADE not reported 14 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with incomplete root development (open apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Recipient site anterior (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.079 [-0.202, 0.044] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Splint: wire composite splint (WCS) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.019 [-0.170, 0.131] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Follow-up (years) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.019 [-0.073, 0.035] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Splinting duration (per week) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.010 [-0.039, 0.059] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Immediate extra-oral time (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.023 [-0.177, 0.132] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Recipient site anterior (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.093 [-0.238, 0.051] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Splint: wire composite splint (WCS) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.016 [-0.138, 0.105] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor 3D printed replica of donor tooth (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.013 [-0.117, 0.144] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Recipient site molar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.035 [-0.185, 0.114] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Occlusal seating (vs infra-occlusion) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.018 [-0.172, 0.137] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Donor arch: both jaws vs only mandible | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.167 [0.055, 0.278] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Splint: orthodontic wire (Ortho) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.072 [-0.246, 0.102] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Donor tooth premolar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.006 [-0.063, 0.074] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Donor tooth molar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.042 [-0.167, 0.085] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Donor tooth molar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.030 [-0.121, 0.181] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Immediate extra-oral time (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.109 [-0.066, 0.284] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Donor arch: both jaws vs only mandible | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.146 [0.002, 0.289] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Donor tooth premolar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.009 [-0.146, 0.128] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Age | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.000 [-0.004, 0.005] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Recipient site anterior (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.079 [-0.199, 0.041] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Follow-up (years) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.002 [-0.022, 0.025] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Splint: suture | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.109 [-0.031, 0.249] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Pre-orthodontic force on donor tooth (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.050 [-0.081, 0.181] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Age | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.004 [-0.012, 0.005] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Occlusal seating (vs infra-occlusion) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.092 [-0.234, 0.050] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor 3D printed replica of donor tooth (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.082 [-0.083, 0.246] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Recipient site premolar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.093 [-0.206, 0.019] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Splint: suture | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.158 [0.059, 0.257] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Splinting duration (per week) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.009 [-0.047, 0.065] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Recipient site molar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) 0.016 [-0.166, 0.198] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Recipient site premolar (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.124 [-0.256, 0.008] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Overall survival rate by prognostic factor Splint: orthodontic wire (Ortho) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.019 [-0.161, 0.124] GRADE not reported 12 studies |
| DAT with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Reference level of the prognostic factor (simple meta-regression) | Success rate by prognostic factor Pre-orthodontic force on donor tooth (yes) | Meta-regression coefficient (rate difference, proportion) -0.014 [-0.167, 0.139] GRADE not reported 11 studies |
Included primary studies 25
Open in Studies| Study | Year | Also included by | Outcomes it informs here | Trial data |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barcellos 2021 Success, Survival Rate, and Soft Tissue Esthetic of Tooth Autotransplantation. PMID:33245974 | 2021 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Barendregt 2023 An evaluation of 1654 premolars transplanted in the posterior region-A retrospective analysis of survival, success and complications. PMID:37114739 | 2023 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| de Carvalho 2014 Statistical analysis of teeth autotransplantation in Portugal's region of Chaves. PMID:24444258 | 2014 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| EzEldeen 2019 Use of CBCT Guidance for Tooth Autotransplantation in Children. PMID:30786806 | 2019 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Jang 2016 Prognostic Factors for Clinical Outcomes in Autotransplantation of Teeth with Complete Root Formation: Survival Analysis for up to 12 Years. PMID:26686824 | 2016 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Louropoulou 2024 An evaluation of 910 premolars transplanted in the anterior region-A retrospective analysis of survival, success, and complications. PMID:37731296 | 2024 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Lucas-Taule 2021 Mid-term outcomes and periodontal prognostic factors of autotransplanted third molars: A retrospective cohort study. PMID:33764523 | 2021 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Mertens 2014 Long-term follow up of post-surgical tooth autotransplantation: a retrospective study. PMID:25329745 | 2016 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Raabe 2021 A retrospective analysis of autotransplanted teeth including an evaluation of a novel surgical technique. PMID:33263141 | 2021 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Strbac 2017 Survival rate of autotransplanted teeth after 5 years - A retrospective cohort study. PMID:28554537 | 2017 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| van Westerveld 2019 Long-term outcomes 1-20 years after autotransplantation of teeth: clinical and radiographic evaluation of 66 premolars and 8 molars. PMID:31239226 | 2019 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Verweij 2016 Success and survival of autotransplanted premolars and molars during short-term clinical follow-up. PMID:26661032 | 2016 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Yu 2017 Autotransplantation of third molars with completely formed roots into surgically created sockets and fresh extraction sockets: a 10-year… PMID:28062250 | 2017 | 1 other review | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Dhar 2022 A Prospective Study on Autotransplantation of Mandibular Third Molars With Complete Root Formation. PMID:36387317 | 2022 | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Grisar 2021 Survival and success of autotransplanted impacted maxillary canines during short-term follow-up: A prospective case-control study. PMID:32777135 | 2021 | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet |
| He 2018 Computer-aided autotransplantation of teeth with 3D printed surgical guides and arch bar: a preliminary experience. PMID:30498633 | 2018 | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Maddalone 2022 Immediate Autotransplantation of Molars with Closed Apex. PMID:35945841 | 2022 | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Michl 2017 Premolar autotransplantation in juvenile dentition: quantitative assessment of vertical bone and soft tissue growth DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2017.02.002 | 2017 | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Michl 2017 Premolar autotransplantation in juvenile dentition: quantitative assessment of vertical bone and soft tissue growth. PMID:28412234 | 2017 | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Nagori 2014 A Immediate autotransplantation of third molars: an experience of 57 cases. PMID:25183229 | 2014 | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Nagori 2014 B Evaluating success of autotransplantation of embedded/impacted third molars harvested using piezosurgery: a pilot study. PMID:24791608 | 2014 | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Raabe 2021 A retrospective analysis of autotransplanted teeth including an evaluation of a novel surgical technique DOI:10.1007/s00784-020-03673-y | 2020 | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Shinde 2018 matched by author and year (probable) | NR | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Wu 2019 Autotransplantation of mature impacted tooth to a fresh molar socket using a 3D replica and guided bone regeneration: two years… PMID:31727038 | 2019 | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet |
| Xia 2020 Autotransplantation of third molars with completely formed roots to replace compromised molars with the computer-aided rapid prototyping. PMID:32064786 | 2020 | this review only | not stated | not extracted yet |
Overlap with other reviews
Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.
| Review | Shared studies | Jaccard |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical outcomes of tooth autotransplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival. (2026) | 13 | 0.22 |
Review question
| Element | Planned (methods) | Found (results) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | Patients with loss of a single tooth (agenesis, trauma, caries, periodontal disease), ASA I or II | Patients with DAT in 23 studies (2837 transplanted teeth per abstract; 2799 per discussion) |
| Intervention | Dental autotransplantation with donor tooth with incomplete root formation (open apex) | Open apex donor teeth (14 studies; 2154 teeth in discussion, 2192 in abstract) |
| Comparison | Dental autotransplantation with donor tooth with complete root formation (closed apex) | Closed apex donor teeth (11 studies; 645 teeth) |
| Outcomes | Survival rate at 6 months, 1, 5, 10 years; success rate; infection-related root resorption; ankylosis; pulpal necrosis | Survival, success, infection-related root resorption, ankylosis rates pooled in both groups; pulp necrosis pooled in open apex group only (9 studies); no closed apex pulp necrosis data |
| Study designs | Human studies: randomized and controlled clinical trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, observational studies, case series (at least 5 candidates) | Prospective and retrospective cohort studies (NOS and QUADAS-2 assessed) |
| Timing | Minimum 1 year follow-up; studies published January 2014 to November 2024 | Mean follow-up 1 to 15 years |