Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41450397

Impact of Periodontal Interventions on Glycemic Indices and Periodontal Status Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Delgado Castromonte Heliette Emperatriz E, Jaramillo Arturo P, Vera Wellinger, et al. · Cureus · 2025 · PubMed · doi:10.7759/cureus.97692

Findings

5 findings

Population
Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and periodontitisPeriodontal intervention (non-surgical periodontal therapy alone or with adjuncts or self-management programs)No active periodontal treatment (hygiene advice only, delayed or routine care)HbA1c change (%)
about 3 months
MD -0.40 [-0.72, -0.09]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 735 participants
Adults (>=18 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus and periodontitisNon-surgical periodontal therapy (scaling and root planing with oral-hygiene instruction), alone or with adjuncts or self-management programsNo active periodontal treatment (delayed or minimal care, hygiene advice only, routine care)HbA1c change (%)
about 3 months · Outpatient and community settings · Fixed-effect model (Figure 2 caption)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
MD -0.38 [-0.52, -0.25]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and periodontitisPeriodontal intervention (non-surgical periodontal therapy alone or with adjuncts or self-management programs)No active periodontal treatment (hygiene advice only, delayed or routine care)HbA1c change (%)
3 to 6 months (all trials, earliest post-treatment visit)
MD -0.36 [-0.60, -0.11]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
10 studies · 960 participants
Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and periodontitisPeriodontal intervention (non-surgical periodontal therapy alone or with adjuncts or self-management programs)No active periodontal treatment (hygiene advice only, delayed or routine care)Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL)
about 3 to 6 months
MD -6.22 [-10.94, -1.49]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
6 studies · 466 participants
Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and periodontitisPeriodontal intervention (non-surgical periodontal therapy alone or with adjuncts or self-management programs)No active periodontal treatment (hygiene advice only, delayed or routine care)Periodontal parameters (probing depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, plaque)
3 to 6 months
Consistently improved vs control; forest plots all favor intervention; Moderate
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Studies not reported

Included primary studies 10

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Al-Abbadi 2025
Non-surgical periodontal therapy with and without hyaluronic acid gel in type 2 diabetic stage-II periodontitis patients: a randomized…
PMID:40665270
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bian 2021
Application value of combination therapy of periodontal curettage and root planing on moderate-to-severe chronic periodontitis in patients…
PMID:33832490
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Brinar 2023
The effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on periodontal disease and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
PMID:37672083
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gomez-Sandoval 2020
Efficacy of clindamycin compared with amoxicillin-metronidazole after a 7-day regimen in the treatment of periodontitis in patients with…
PMID:31958293
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mizuno 2017
The effects of non-surgical periodontal treatment on glycemic control, oxidative stress balance and quality of life in patients with type…
PMID:29145468
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Qureshi 2021
Clinical efficacy of scaling and root planing with and without metronidazole on glycemic control: three-arm randomized controlled trial.
PMID:33980234
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rapone 2021
Inflammatory Status and Glycemic Control Level of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Periodontitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
PMID:33804123
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tsobgny-Tsague 2018
Effects of nonsurgical periodontal treatment on glycated haemoglobin on type 2 diabetes patients (PARODIA 1 study): a randomized…
PMID:29482543
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wernicke 2021
Influence of physical activity on periodontal health in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A blinded, randomized, controlled trial.
PMID:33796948
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2025
Community interventions improve diabetes management and oral health in type 2 diabetes patients with chronic periodontitis.
PMID:40628879
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (>=18 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus and periodontitisAdults with T2DM and periodontitis (10 studies, >1500 participants reported)
InterventionNSPT (scaling and root planing with oral-hygiene instruction) alone or with adjuncts (systemic/topical antimicrobials, aPDT, hyaluronic acid) or self-management programsNSPT with or without adjuncts (povidone-iodine, systemic antibiotics, aPDT, hyaluronic acid), physical activity, education and self-management programs (n=10)
ComparisonNo active periodontal treatment (delayed or minimal care, routine care, pre-intervention status)Hygiene advice only, delayed treatment, routine care (n=10)
OutcomesHbA1c (primary); fasting plasma glucose; probing depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, plaque indices; CRP, oxidative stress, quality of lifeHbA1c (n=10 pooled); fasting plasma glucose (n=6 pooled); periodontal parameters (narrative, GRADE only)
Study designsRandomized and non-randomized comparative studies; parallel-group trials and single-group pre-post studies9 RCTs/cluster RCTs and 1 comparative prospective study (n=10)
TimingEarliest post-treatment visit within 3 to 6 months; subgroup of longer follow-up (6 months or more)3 to 6 months

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalNoNoyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalNoNoyes
5Study selection in duplicateNoNoyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: Partial YesNRSI: Partial Yes · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: NoNRSI: No · RCT: Nono
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes