Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41249719

Therapeutic outcomes of ²²⁵Ac/¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA combination therapy in advanced metastatic Castration-Resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.

Belabaci Zineddine, Brignoli Giulio, Zilli Thomas, et al. · European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1007/s00259-025-07627-y

Findings

20 findings

Population
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Thrombocytopenia, grade 3 or higherCrude pooled proportion 0.06
GRADE not reported
136 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Leukopenia, grade 1 to 2Crude pooled proportion 0.30
GRADE not reported
116 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Xerostomia, grade 3 or higherCrude pooled proportion 0.00
GRADE not reported
265 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)PSA decline of 50% or more (PSA50 response)Proportion (random-effects, REML) 0.47 [0.37, 0.56]
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 323 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Progressive disease by PSA (PSA increase of 25% or more)Proportion (random-effects, REML) 0.15 [0.07, 0.23]
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 323 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Anemia, grade 3 or higherCrude pooled proportion 0.10
GRADE not reported
136 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Nephrotoxicity, grade 1 to 2Crude pooled proportion 0.46
GRADE not reported
116 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Any PSA declineProportion (random-effects, REML) 0.78 [0.70, 0.86]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 290 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Leukopenia, grade 3 or higherCrude pooled proportion 0.02
GRADE not reported
136 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Anemia, grade 1 to 2Crude pooled proportion 0.68
GRADE not reported
116 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Xerostomia, grade 1 to 2Crude pooled proportion 0.71
GRADE not reported
265 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Stable disease by PSA (PSA increase under 25% or decrease under 50%)Proportion (random-effects, REML) 0.33 [0.28, 0.39]
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 323 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Nephrotoxicity, grade 3 or higherCrude pooled proportion 0.007
GRADE not reported
136 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)PSA decline of 50% or more (PSA50 response)
Six studies in the prior Lu-PSMA exposure subgroup analysis (overall)
Proportion (random-effects, REML) 0.44 [0.32, 0.56]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 169 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Thrombocytopenia, grade 1 to 2Crude pooled proportion 0.26
GRADE not reported
116 participants
Adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Overall survivalPooled median overall survival (months) 11.8 [9.0, 14.6]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adults with mCRPC previously treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)PSA decline of 50% or more (PSA50 response)
Prior [177Lu]Lu-PSMA exposure: pre-treated
Proportion (random-effects, REML) 0.41 [0.23, 0.59]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 121 participants
Adults with mCRPC previously treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Anemia, grade 3 or higher
Prior [177Lu]Lu-PSMA exposure: pre-treated
Crude pooled proportion 0.12
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with mCRPC naive to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)Anemia, grade 3 or higher
Prior [177Lu]Lu-PSMA exposure: naive
Crude pooled proportion 0.06
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with mCRPC naive to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination (tandem) radioligand therapyNone (single-arm studies)PSA decline of 50% or more (PSA50 response)
Prior [177Lu]Lu-PSMA exposure: naive
Proportion (random-effects, REML) 0.50 [0.36, 0.64]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 48 participants

Included primary studies 8

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Khreish 2020
225Ac-PSMA-617/177Lu-PSMA-617 tandem therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: pilot experience.
PMID:31758224
20201 other reviewPSA decline of 50% or more (PSA50 response)not extracted yet
Rathke 2024
Deescalated 225Ac-PSMA-617 Versus 177Lu/225Ac-PSMA-617 Cocktail Therapy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 233 Patients.
PMID:38844358
20241 other reviewPSA decline of 50% or more (PSA50 response)not extracted yet
Rosar 2021 (n=15)
Efficacy and Safety of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 Augmented [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy in Patients with Highly Advanced mCRPC with…
PMID:34069003
20211 other reviewPSA decline of 50% or more (PSA50 response)not extracted yet
Rosar 2021 (n=17)
Molecular imaging and biochemical response assessment after a single cycle of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 tandem therapy in…
PMID:33754047
20211 other reviewPSA decline of 50% or more (PSA50 response)not extracted yet
Rosar 2024 (augmentation, n=33)
225 Ac-PSMA-617 Augmentation in High-Risk mCRPC Undergoing 177 Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy : Pilot Experience From a Prospective…
PMID:38769643
20241 other reviewPSA decline of 50% or more (PSA50 response)not extracted yet
Sheikh 2025
RECIP 1.0 + PSA for response assessment in mCRPC patients treated with 225Ac / 177Lu PSMA combination therapy.
PMID:40038098
20251 other reviewPSA decline of 50% or more (PSA50 response)not extracted yet
Burgard 2024
Analysis of Molecular Imaging Biomarkers Derived from [18F]FDG PET/CT in mCRPC: Whole-Body Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) Predicts Overall…
PMID:39456626
2024this review onlyPSA decline of 50% or more (PSA50 response)not extracted yet
Rosar 2025 (REALITY, n=51)
225 Ac-PSMA-617 Augmentation After Insufficient Response Under 177 Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy in mCRPC: Evaluation of Outcome and…
PMID:39787407
2025this review onlyPSA decline of 50% or more (PSA50 response)not extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdult men (>18 years) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancerPatients with mCRPC (n=323)
Intervention[225Ac]Ac-/[177Lu]Lu-PSMA combination therapyAc-225/Lu-177 PSMA tandem therapy (n=8)
Comparison[225Ac]Ac-PSMA monotherapy, [177Lu]Lu-PSMA monotherapy, or no comparator (single-arm)None (single-arm studies)
OutcomesPSA responses (any decline, >50% decline, stable disease, progressive disease); overall survival, PSA progression-free survival, adverse eventsPSA50 (n=8); any PSA decline (n=7); stable disease (n=8); progressive disease (n=8); median overall survival (n=8); adverse events (n=136)
Study designsRandomized trials, prospective and retrospective studiesRetrospective studies from Germany (n=8)
TimingNot specifiedNot specified

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalNoPartial Yesno
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalNRSI: Partial Yes · RCT: N/ANRSI: Partial Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalNRSI: Yes · RCT: N/ANRSI: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowLowno