Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41139814

Influence of Engine-Driven NiTi Files on the Effectiveness and Technical Quality of Endodontic Treatment Performed by Undergraduate Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Barbosa Monique Corrêa Rocha Ferrari, Ribeiro Elidiane Elias, Pinto Karem Paula, et al. · International endodontic journal · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1111/iej.70056

Findings

Population Patients receiving primary non-surgical root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students

9 findings

Engine-driven NiTi instrumentation (rotary or reciprocating)Stainless-steel hand instrumentationAdequate overall quality of root canal treatment
Post-treatment periapical radiographic assessment · Undergraduate dental student clinics
OR 4.52 [1.55, 13.16]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
3 studies · 824 participants
Engine-driven NiTi instrumentation (rotary or reciprocating)Stainless-steel hand instrumentationAdequate root canal obturation length
Post-treatment periapical radiographic assessment · Undergraduate dental student clinics
OR 2.19 [1.60, 3.02]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
3 studies · 1131 participants
Engine-driven NiTi instrumentation (rotary or reciprocating)Stainless-steel hand instrumentationProcedural errors (overall)
Post-treatment periapical radiographic assessment · Undergraduate dental student clinics
OR 0.70 [0.40, 1.25]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
4 studies · 1208 participants
Engine-driven NiTi instrumentation (rotary or reciprocating)Stainless-steel hand instrumentationInstrument separation
Post-treatment periapical radiographic assessment · Undergraduate dental student clinics
OR 1.13 [0.66, 1.94]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
4 studies · 1759 participants
Engine-driven NiTi instrumentation (rotary or reciprocating)Stainless-steel hand instrumentationAdequate root canal obturation homogeneity
Post-treatment periapical radiographic assessment · Undergraduate dental student clinics
OR 3.35 [0.91, 12.28]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
2 studies · 263 participants
Engine-driven NiTi instrumentation (rotary or reciprocating)Stainless-steel hand instrumentationLedge formation
Post-treatment periapical radiographic assessment · Undergraduate dental student clinics
OR 0.35 [0.17, 0.74]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
3 studies · 1502 participants
Engine-driven NiTi instrumentation (rotary or reciprocating)Stainless-steel hand instrumentationOverfilling
Post-treatment periapical radiographic assessment · Undergraduate dental student clinics
OR 0.91 [0.55, 1.51]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
4 studies · 2142 participants
Engine-driven NiTi instrumentation (rotary or reciprocating)Stainless-steel hand instrumentationPerforation
Post-treatment periapical radiographic assessment · Undergraduate dental student clinics
OR 0.74 [0.48, 1.14]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
3 studies · 1502 participants
Engine-driven NiTi instrumentation (rotary or reciprocating)Stainless-steel hand instrumentationApical transportation
Post-treatment periapical radiographic assessment · Undergraduate dental student clinics
OR 0.68 [0.35, 1.32]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
2 studies · 1010 participants

Included primary studies 14

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Almanei 2018
Pars intermedia ACTH and MSH content: effect of adrenalectomy, gonadectomy and a neurotropic (noise) stress.
PMID:201881
1977this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cheung 2009
A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques.
PMID:19567311
2009this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
El-Ma'aita 2024
Molar root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students; an observational study of procedural errors and student perception
DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-05397-z
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
El-Ma'aita 2024
Molar root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students; an observational study of procedural errors and student perception.
PMID:38649844
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Haug 2018
Impact of Case Difficulty on Endodontic Mishaps in an Undergraduate Student Clinic
DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2018.03.012
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Haug 2018
Impact of Case Difficulty on Endodontic Mishaps in an Undergraduate Student Clinic.
PMID:29803337
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kelbauskas 2009
Quality of root canal filling performed by undergraduate students of odontology at Kaunas University of Medicine in Lithuania.
PMID:19996675
2009this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Marinova 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Matoug-Elwerfelli 2022
Radiographic assessment of endodontic mishaps in an undergraduate student clinic: a 2-year retrospective study.
PMID:35945941
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Micooğulları Kurt 2022
Quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using nickel‐titanium reciprocating versus hand instruments
DOI:10.1002/jdd.13038
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Miçooğulları Kurt 2022
Quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using nickel-titanium reciprocating versus hand instruments.
PMID:35830253
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tekin 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tekín 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zajkowski 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients submitted to root canal treatment performed by undergraduate studentsPatients treated by undergraduate dental students (n=10 studies; 23 to 652 teeth per study)
InterventionEngine-driven NiTi primary non-surgical root canal treatment (rotary or reciprocating)Engine-driven NiTi files: rotary (n=7 studies) or reciprocating (n=3 studies)
ComparisonStainless-steel hand root canal preparationStainless-steel hand files (mostly K-files, step-back technique)
OutcomesQuality of root canal treatment (postoperative pain, periapical healing, length and homogeneity of root canal fillings, procedural errors)Adequate overall quality; filling length; filling homogeneity; procedural errors; overfilling; ledges; perforation; apical transportation; instrument separation; also periapical healing and postoperative pain (single studies)
Study designsRandomised and non-randomised clinical studiesRandomised clinical trials (n=5) and non-randomised studies (n=5)
TimingNot specifiedFollow-up reported in only two studies (minimum 1 year)