Cochrane · systematic review · CD015252

Adenoidectomy for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children

MacKeith, S, Mulvaney, CA, Galbraith, K, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

ENTAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
16
current version
GRADE rated
11
No studies
5
Included studies
NR
No studies 5 · 31.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 8 · 50%Low 1 · 6.3%Moderate 2 · 12.5%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Adenoidectomy (with or without myringotomy) compared to no treatment/watchful waiting for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children

Population: children aged 6 months to 12 years with otitis media with effusion (OME)
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hearing: proportion with normal hearing ‐ up to 12 months № of participants: 42 (1 RCT)
Adenoidectomy (with or without myringotomy) vs no treatment/watchful waiting
RR 0.97 [0.65, 1.46]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Disease‐specific quality of life
Adenoidectomy (with or without myringotomy) vs no treatment/watchful waiting
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Presence or persistence of OME ‐ over 12 months № of participants: 354(3 RCTs)
Adenoidectomy (with or without myringotomy) vs no treatment/watchful waiting
RR 0.9 [0.81, 1]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse event: haemorrhage № of participants: 480(1 RCT)
Adenoidectomy (with or without myringotomy) vs no treatment/watchful waiting
Peto OR 6.77NRModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Adenoidectomy and bilateral ventilation tubes compared to bilateral ventilation tubes only for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children

Population: children aged 6 months to 12 years with otitis media with effusion (OME)
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hearing: return to normal hearing at 6 to 9 months № of participants: 127 (1 RCT, 213 ears assessed)
Adenoidectomy and bilateral ventilation tubes vs bilateral ventilation tubes only
RR 1.36 [0.98, 1.89]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Disease‐specific quality of life
Adenoidectomy and bilateral ventilation tubes vs bilateral ventilation tubes only
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Presence/persistence of OME ‐ over 12 months № of participants: 254 (1 RCT)
Adenoidectomy and bilateral ventilation tubes vs bilateral ventilation tubes only
RR 0.96 [0.86, 1.07]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse event: haemorrhage № of participants: 791(2 RCTs)
Adenoidectomy and bilateral ventilation tubes vs bilateral ventilation tubes only
Peto OR 6.68 [0.42, 107.18]NRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Adenoidectomy and unilateral ventilation tube compared to unilateral ventilation tube only for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children

Population: children aged 6 months to 12 years with otitis media with effusion (OME)
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hearing: proportion of children with hearing returned to normal (12 months ‐ medium‐term) ‐ normal hearing ≤ 15 dB № of participants: 72 (1 RCT)
Adenoidectomy and unilateral ventilation tube vs unilateral ventilation tube only
RR 1.24 [0.79, 1.96]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Disease‐specific quality of life
Adenoidectomy and unilateral ventilation tube vs unilateral ventilation tube only
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Presence or persistence of OME (3 years ‐ long‐term) № of participants: 74 (1 RCT)
Adenoidectomy and unilateral ventilation tube vs unilateral ventilation tube only
RR 0.67 [0.35, 1.29]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse event: haemorrhage
Adenoidectomy and unilateral ventilation tube vs unilateral ventilation tube only
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes compared to no treatment/watchful waiting for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children

Population: children aged 6 months to 12 years with otitis media with effusion (OME)
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hearing: hearing threshold (at 2 years ‐ long‐term) № of participants: 211(1 RCT)
Adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes vs no treatment/watchful waiting
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Disease‐specific quality of life
Adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes vs no treatment/watchful waiting
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Presence/persistence of OME (at 2 years ‐ long‐term) № of participants: 232(1 RCT)
Adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes vs no treatment/watchful waiting
RR 0.91 [0.82, 1.01]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse event: haemorrhage № of participants: 416(2 RCTs)
Adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes vs no treatment/watchful waiting
no estimate extractedNRModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision