Cochrane · systematic review · CD014805

Platinum‐based chemotherapy for early triple‐negative breast cancer

Mason, SRE, Willson, ML, Egger, SJ, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

Breast CancerAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
15
current version
GRADE rated
14
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 6.7%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 3 · 20%High 11 · 73.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Platinum‐containing chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy without platinum in neoadjuvant therapy for early triple‐negative breast cancer

Population: neoadjuvant therapy for early triple‐negative breast cancer
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
DFS at 2 years
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
HR 0.63 [0.53, 0.75]8 studies · 1966 participantsHigh
DFS at 5 years
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
HR 0.63 [0.53, 0.75]8 studies · 1966 participantsHigh
OS at 2 years
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
HR 0.69 [0.55, 0.86]8 studies · 1973 participantsHigh
OS at 5 years
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
HR 0.69 [0.55, 0.86]8 studies · 1973 participantsHigh
Pathological complete response
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
RR 1.44 [1.31, 1.59]15 studies · 3083 participantsHigh

Platinum‐containing chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy without platinum in adjuvant therapy for early triple‐negative breast cancer

Population: adjuvant therapy for early triple‐negative breast cancer
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
DFS at 2 years
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
HR 0.69 [0.54, 0.88]4 studies · 1256 participantsHigh
DFS at 5 years
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
HR 0.69 [0.54, 0.88]4 studies · 1256 participantsHigh
OS at 2 years
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
HR 0.7 [0.5, 0.96]4 studies · 1256 participantsHigh
OS at 5 years
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
HR 0.7 [0.5, 0.96]4 studies · 1256 participantsHigh

Platinum‐containing chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy without platinum for early triple‐negative breast cancer

Population: early triple‐negative breast cancer
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Participants requiring chemotherapy delays
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
RR 2.23 [1.7, 2.94]5 studies · 1053 participantsHigh
Participants requiring dose reduction
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
RR 1.77 [1.56, 2.02]8 studies · 2055 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Anaemia (grade III/IV)
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
RR 8.2 [5.66, 11.89]19 studies · 4757 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Febrile neutropenia (grade III/IV)
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
RR 1.16 [0.89, 1.49]12 studies · 3771 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Renal impairment (grade III/IV)
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
no estimate extracted4 studies · 463 participantsHigh
Quality of life
Platinum‐containing chemotherapy vs chemotherapy without platinum
no estimate extractedNRNo studies