Cochrane · systematic review · CD013657

Community‐based interventions for improving mental health in refugee children and adolescents in high‐income countries

Soltan, F, Cristofalo, D, Marshall, D, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library

Common Mental DisordersAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
8
current version
GRADE rated
8
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 50%Low 4 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings table ‐ Teaching Recovery Techniques compared to waiting list for health problem or population

Population: health problem or population
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Symptoms of post‐traumatic stress at 3 months post‐treatment
Summary of findings table ‐ Teaching Recovery Techniques vs waiting list
no estimate extracted1 study · 63 participantsLow
Downgraded: inconsistency
Symptoms of depression at 3 months post‐treatment
Summary of findings table ‐ Teaching Recovery Techniques vs waiting list
no estimate extracted1 study · 63 participantsLow
Downgraded: inconsistency
Psychological distress post‐treatment
Summary of findings table ‐ Teaching Recovery Techniques vs waiting list
no estimate extracted1 study · 16 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Child behaviour post‐treatment
Summary of findings table ‐ Teaching Recovery Techniques vs waiting list
no estimate extracted1 study · 16 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Externalising behaviours 5 weeks post‐treatment
Summary of findings table ‐ Teaching Recovery Techniques vs waiting list
no estimate extracted1 study · 31 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Externalising behaviours 3 months post‐treatment
Summary of findings table ‐ Teaching Recovery Techniques vs waiting list
no estimate extracted1 study · 82 participantsLow
Downgraded: inconsistency
Internalising behaviours 5 weeks post‐treatment
Summary of findings table ‐ Teaching Recovery Techniques vs waiting list
no estimate extracted1 study · 31 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Internalising behaviours 3 months post‐treatment
Summary of findings table ‐ Teaching Recovery Techniques vs waiting list
no estimate extracted1 study · 82 participantsLow
Downgraded: inconsistency