Cochrane · systematic review · CD013551

Prothrombin complex concentrate in cardiac surgery for the treatment of coagulopathic bleeding

Hayes, K, Fernando, MC, Jordan, V · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library

HeartAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
16
current version
GRADE rated
14
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 12.5%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 37.5%Low 3 · 18.8%Moderate 5 · 31.3%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

PCC compared to standard treatment for cardiac surgery for the treatment of non‐surgical bleeding

Population: cardiac surgery for the treatment of non‐surgical bleeding
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Blood products transfused (RBC) in units
PCC vs standard treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 151 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Blood products transfused (RBC) % of patients
PCC vs standard treatment
OR 0.53 [0.2, 1.4]1 study · 101 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Thrombotic events
PCC vs standard treatment
OR 0.68 [0.2, 2.31]2 studies · 152 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Mortality (30‐day)
PCC vs standard treatment
OR 0.53 [0.12, 2.35]2 studies · 149 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Intensive care length of stay in hours
PCC vs standard treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 151 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Incidence of renal impairment
PCC vs standard treatment
OR 0.72 [0.14, 3.59]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Bleeding (chest drain output) in mLs for the first 12 hours
PCC vs standard treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 151 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Adverse events
PCC vs standard treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

PCC compared to FVIIa for cardiac surgery for the treatment of non‐surgical bleeding

Population: cardiac surgery for the treatment of non‐surgical bleeding
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Blood products transfused (RBC) in units ‐ intraoperative
PCC vs FVIIa
no estimate extracted2 studies · 256 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Blood products transfused (RBC) % of patients
PCC vs FVIIa
OR 0.16 [0.02, 1.56]1 study · 150 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Thrombotic events
PCC vs FVIIa
OR 0.51 [0.23, 1.16]4 studies · 407 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Mortality (30‐day)
PCC vs FVIIa
OR 1.07 [0.38, 3.03]3 studies · 278 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Bleeding (chest drain output) in mLs for the first 12 hours
PCC vs FVIIa
no estimate extracted1 study · 150 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Intensive care length of stay in hours
PCC vs FVIIa
no estimate extracted1 study · 106 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Incidence of renal impairment
PCC vs FVIIa
OR 0.29 [0.12, 0.71]1 study · 106 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events
PCC vs FVIIa
no estimate extractedNRNo studies