Cochrane · systematic review · CD013513

Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis

Chong, L-Y, Piromchai, P, Sharp, S, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

ENT2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
24
current version
GRADE rated
23
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 4.2%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 8 · 33.3%Low 8 · 33.3%Moderate 5 · 20.8%High 2 · 8.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Anti‐IL‐4Rα mAb (dupilumab) compared to placebo (on top of topical steroids) for chronic rhinosinusitis

Population: patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Health‐related quality of life ‐ disease‐specific (SNOT‐22, range 0 to 110, lower = better)
Anti‐IL‐4Rα mAb (dupilumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 784 participantsHigh
Disease severity ‐ VAS (range 0 to 10, lower = better)
Anti‐IL‐4Rα mAb (dupilumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 784 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Serious adverse events
Anti‐IL‐4Rα mAb (dupilumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
RR 0.47 [0.29, 0.76]3 studies · 782 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Avoidance of surgery ‐ number of patients who had surgery as rescue treatment
Anti‐IL‐4Rα mAb (dupilumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
RR 0.17 [0.05, 0.52]2 studies · 725 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Extent of disease: endoscopic nasal polyp score (range 0 to 8, lower = better)
Anti‐IL‐4Rα mAb (dupilumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 784 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Extent of disease: CT scan score (Lund‐Mackay, range 0 to 24, lower = better)
Anti‐IL‐4Rα mAb (dupilumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 784 participantsHigh
Health‐related quality of life ‐ generic (EQ‐5D visual analogue scale, range 0 to 100, higher = better)
Anti‐IL‐4Rα mAb (dupilumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 766 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Adverse events ‐ nasopharyngitis, including sore throat (longest available data)
Anti‐IL‐4Rα mAb (dupilumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
RR 0.95 [0.72, 1.25]3 studies · 783 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Anti‐IL‐5 mAb (mepolizumab) compared to placebo (on top of topical steroids) for chronic rhinosinusitis

Population: patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Health‐related quality of life ‐ disease‐specific (SNOT‐22, range 1 to 100, lower = better)
Anti‐IL‐5 mAb (mepolizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted1 study · 105 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Disease severity ‐ VAS (range 0 to 10, lower = better)
Anti‐IL‐5 mAb (mepolizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted1 study · 72 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Serious adverse events
Anti‐IL‐5 mAb (mepolizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
RR 1.57 [0.07, 35.46]2 studies · 135 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Avoidance of surgery ‐ patients still meeting the criteria for surgery At end of
Anti‐IL‐5 mAb (mepolizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
RR 0.78 [0.64, 0.94]2 studies · 135 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Extent of disease ‐ endoscopic score
Anti‐IL‐5 mAb (mepolizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 137 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Extent of disease ‐ CT scan score (Lund‐Mackay, range 0 to 24, lower = better)
Anti‐IL‐5 mAb (mepolizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted1 study · 27 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Health‐related quality of life ‐ generic, measured using the EQ‐5D visual analogue scale (range 0 to 100; 0 = worst imaginable health state, 100 = best imaginable health state)
Anti‐IL‐5 mAb (mepolizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted1 study · 105 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Adverse events ‐ nasopharyngitis, including sore throat
Anti‐IL‐5 mAb (mepolizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
RR 0.73 [0.36, 1.47]2 studies · 135 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision

Anti‐IgE mAb (omalizumab) compared to placebo (on top of topical steroids) for chronic rhinosinusitis

Population: patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Health‐related quality of life ‐ disease‐specific (SNOT‐22, range 0 to 110, lower = better)
Anti‐IgE mAb (omalizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 265 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Disease severity, as measured by validated, patient‐reported symptom score
Anti‐IgE mAb (omalizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events
Anti‐IgE mAb (omalizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
RR 0.32 [0.05, 2]5 studies · 329 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Avoidance of surgery Nasal polyp score ≤4 (≤ 2 on each side) and an improvement in SNOT‐22 score of ≥ 8.9 points
Anti‐IgE mAb (omalizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
RR 5.6 [1.99, 15.76]2 studies · 265 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Extent of disease: endoscopic nasal polyp score (range 0 to 8, lower = better)
Anti‐IgE mAb (omalizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted4 studies · 312 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Extent of disease: CT scan (lower score = better)
Anti‐IgE mAb (omalizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 47 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Health‐related quality of life ‐ generic (SF‐36)
Anti‐IgE mAb (omalizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 38 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Adverse events ‐ nasopharyngitis, including sore throat
Anti‐IgE mAb (omalizumab) vs placebo (on top of topical steroids)
RR 0.71 [0.29, 1.73]5 studies · 329 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness