Cochrane · systematic review · CD013502

Surgery for rotator cuff tears

Karjalainen, TV, Jain, NB, Heikkinen, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

MusculoskeletalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 33.3%Low 3 · 50%Moderate 1 · 16.7%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Surgery compared to non‐operative treatment for people with full thickness rotator cuff tears

Population: people with full‐thickness rotator cuff tears
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pain (VAS) from 0 to 10, 0 is no pain
Surgery vs non‐operative treatment
no estimate extracted3 studies · 258 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Functional outcome (Constant score) from 0 to 100, 100 is best)
Surgery vs non‐operative treatment
no estimate extracted3 studies · 269 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Participant‐rated global assessment of treatment success at 12 months
Surgery vs non‐operative treatment
RR 1.08 [0.96, 1.22]1 study · 110 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Health‐related quality of life (SF‐36 mental component) from 0‐100; 100 is best)
Surgery vs non‐operative treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 103 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events
Surgery vs non‐operative treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 103 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Serious adverse events
Surgery vs non‐operative treatment
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision