Cochrane · systematic review · CD013085

Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency

de Moraes Silva, MA, Nakano, LCU, Cisneros, LL, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

Vascular2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
21
current version
GRADE rated
11
No studies
10
Included studies
NR
No studies 10 · 47.6%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 28.6%Low 4 · 19%Moderate 1 · 4.8%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Current version only

Balneotherapy compared to no treatment for chronic venous insufficiency

Population: people with chronic venous insufficiency
CD013085.PUB3 (current) · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Disease severity signs and symptoms score (VCSS, scale 0–27, lower is better)
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
no estimate extracted3 studies · 671 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Health‐related quality of life(CIVIQ2, scale 20–100, lower is better)
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 153 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse effects of treatment (thromboembolic event)
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
OR 0.35 [0.09, 1.42]3 studies · 584 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Pain (VAS, scale 0–10, lower is better)
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 354 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Oedema(leg circumference in cm, lower is better)
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
no estimate extracted3 studies · 369 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Incidence of leg ulcer
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
OR 1.06 [0.27, 4.14]2 studies · 449 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Skin pigmentation changes (pigmentation index, 0–10, lower is better)
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 59 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Balneotherapy compared to melilotus officinalis for chronic venous insufficiency

Population: people with chronic venous insufficiency
CD013085.PUB3 (current) · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Disease severity signs and symptoms score
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects of treatment
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Pain (% of participants)
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
OR 0.29 [0.03, 2.87]1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Oedema (% of participants)
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
OR 0.21 [0.02, 2.27]1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Incidence of leg ulcer
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Skin pigmentation changes
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Balneotherapy compared to dryland exercise for chronic venous insufficiency

Population: people with chronic venous insufficiency
CD013085.PUB3 (current) · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Disease severity signs and symptoms score
Balneotherapy vs dryland exercise
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Balneotherapy vs dryland exercise
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse effects of treatment
Balneotherapy vs dryland exercise
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Pain
Balneotherapy vs dryland exercise
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oedema (leg volume in mL, lower is better)
Balneotherapy vs dryland exercise
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Incidence of leg ulcer
Balneotherapy vs dryland exercise
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Skin pigmentation changes
Balneotherapy vs dryland exercise
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Balneotherapy compared to no treatment for chronic venous insufficiency

Population: people with chronic venous insufficiency
CD013085.PUB2 · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Disease severity signs and symptoms score –VCSS Scale: 0–27
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 484 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Health‐related quality of life –CIVIQ2 Scale: 20–100
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 149 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Adverse events of treatment –thromboembolic event
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
OR 0.35 [0.09, 1.42]3 studies · 584 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 390 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Oedema
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 153 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Incidence of leg ulcer
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
OR 1.69 [0.82, 3.48]2 studies · 449 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Skin pigmentation changes ‐ pigmentation index
Balneotherapy vs no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 59 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Balneotherapy compared to melilotus officinalis for chronic venous insufficiency

Population: people with chronic venous insufficiency
CD013085.PUB2 · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Disease severity signs and symptoms score
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events of treatment
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Pain
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
OR 0.29 [0.03, 2.87]1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Oedema
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
OR 0.21 [0.02, 2.27]1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Incidence of leg ulcer
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Skin pigmentation changes
Balneotherapy vs melilotus officinalis
no estimate extractedNRNo studies