Cochrane · systematic review · CD012650

Pharmacological and non‐pharmacological strategies for obese women with subfertility

Taghavi, SA, van Wely, M, Jahanfar, S, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

Gynaecology and FertilityAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
25
current version
GRADE rated
19
No studies
6
Included studies
NR
No studies 6 · 24%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 15 · 60%Low 4 · 16%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Non‐pharmacological intervention compared to no intervention or placebo for obese women with subfertility

Population: obese women with subfertility
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth
Non‐pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
OR 0.85 [0.65, 1.12]3 studies · 917 participantsLow
Downgraded: inconsistency
Ongoing pregnancy
Non‐pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
OR 0.81 [0.58, 1.13]1 study · 564 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Miscarriage
Non‐pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
OR 1.54 [0.99, 2.39]3 studies · 917 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Clinical pregnancy
Non‐pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
OR 1.06 [0.81, 1.4]3 studies · 917 participantsLow
Downgraded: inconsistency
Weight changeBMI change (Einarsson 2017)
Non‐pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 305 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
BMI change (Sim 2014)
Non‐pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 43 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life/Mental health outcome
Non‐pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Non‐pharmacological intervention compared to non‐pharmacological intervention for obese women with subfertility

Population: obese women with subfertility
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth
Non‐pharmacological intervention vs non‐pharmacological intervention
OR 11 [0.43, 284]1 study · 11 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Miscarriage
Non‐pharmacological intervention vs non‐pharmacological intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clinical pregnancy
Non‐pharmacological intervention vs non‐pharmacological intervention
OR 11 [0.43, 284]1 study · 11 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Weight changeWeight change (kg) Body mass index (BMI)
Non‐pharmacological intervention vs non‐pharmacological intervention
no estimate extracted1 study · 11 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Quality of life/Mental health outcomeMental health (at 12 weeks) Quality of life (at 12 weeks)
Non‐pharmacological intervention vs non‐pharmacological intervention
no estimate extracted1 study · 11 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias

Pharmacological intervention compared to pharmacological intervention for obese women with subfertility

Population: obese women with subfertility
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth
Pharmacological intervention vs pharmacological intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events ‐ Metformin plus liraglutide vs metformin Nausea Diarrhoea Headache
Pharmacological intervention vs pharmacological intervention
OR 7.22 [0.72, 73]1 study · 28 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Clinical pregnancyMetformin plus liraglutide vs metformin Met + CC + L‐carnitine vs Met + CC + placebo
Pharmacological intervention vs pharmacological intervention
OR 5.2 [2.59, 10.4]1 study · 28 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
MiscarriageMet + CC + L‐carnitine vs Met + CC + placebo
Pharmacological intervention vs pharmacological intervention
OR 3.58 [0.73, 17.6]1 study · 274 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Weight ‐ BMI changeMetformin plus liraglutide vs metformin Met + CC + L‐carnitine vs Met + CC + placebo Weight changeDexfenfluramine vs placebo Weight ‐ body fatMetformin plus liraglutide vs metformin
Pharmacological intervention vs pharmacological intervention
no estimate extracted1 study · 28 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Quality of life/Mental health outcome
Pharmacological intervention vs pharmacological intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Pharmacological intervention compared to no intervention or placebo for obese women with subfertility

Population: obese women with subfertility
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth
Pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
OR 1.57 [0.44, 5.57]1 study · 65 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Ongoing pregnancy
Pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Miscarriage
Pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
OR 0.5 [0.04, 5.8]1 study · 65 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Adverse events (GI)
Pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
OR 0.91 [0.32, 2.57]1 study · 65 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Clinical pregnancy
Pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
OR 2.67 [0.9, 7.93]2 studies · 96 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Weight changeBMI WHR
Pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 143 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life/Mental health outcome
Pharmacological intervention vs no intervention or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies