Cochrane · systematic review · CD012279
Computerised cognitive training for preventing dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment
Gates, NJ, Vernooij, RWM, Di Nisio, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library
Dementia and Cognitive ImprovementAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
13
current version
GRADE rated
13
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 10 · 76.9%Low 3 · 23.1%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Comparison
Population: patients with mild cognitive impairment
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Global cognitive functioning ( | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 407 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Episodic memory ( | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 223 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Speed of processing ( | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 119 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Executive functioning ( | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 150 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Working memory ( | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 72 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Verbal fluency ( | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 150 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Quality of life (3 months of | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 19 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Comparison
Population: patients with mild cognitive impairment
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Global cognitive functioning (measured at 12 months of | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 37 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Episodic memory (measured at 12 months of | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 37 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Executive function (measured at 12 months of | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 37 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Verbal fluency (measured at 12 months of | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 37 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Depression (measured at 12 months of | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 37 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Functional performance (measured at 12 months of | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 37 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |