Cochrane · systematic review · CD011968
Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for impairment and disability in people after stroke
Kamo, T, Wada, Y, Okamura, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
28
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
23
Included studies
NR
No studies 23 · 82.1%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 5 · 17.9%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Current version onlyActive rPMS only compared with sham rPMS in stroke
Population: people with stroke
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living (ADLs) Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Upper limb function Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Lower limb function Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (elbow) Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (wrist) Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Muscle strength Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 18 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Death Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Active rPMS only compared with no intervention in stroke
Population: people with stroke
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living (ADLs) Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Upper limb function Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Lower limb function Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (elbow) Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (wrist) Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Muscle strength Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Death Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Active rPMS plus rehabilitation compared with sham rPMS plus rehabilitation in stroke
Population: people with stroke
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living (ADLs) Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Upper limb function Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Lower limb function Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (elbow) Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Spasticity (wrist) Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Muscle strength Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Death Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Active rPMS plus rehabilitation compared with rehabilitation only in stroke
Population: people with stroke
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living (ADLs) Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Upper limb function Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Lower limb function Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (elbow) Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (wrist) Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Muscle strength Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Death Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Active rPMS only compared with sham rPMS in stroke
Population: people with stroke
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living (ADLs) Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Upper limb function Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Lower limb function Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (elbow) Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (wrist) Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Muscle strength Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 18 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Death Active rPMS only vs sham rPMS | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Active rPMS only compared with no intervention in stroke
Population: people with stroke
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living (ADLs) Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Upper limb function Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Lower limb function Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (elbow) Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (wrist) Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Muscle strength Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Death Active rPMS only vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Active rPMS plus rehabilitation compared with sham rPMS plus rehabilitation in stroke
Population: people with stroke
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living (ADLs) Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Upper limb function Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Lower limb function Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (elbow) Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Spasticity (wrist) Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Muscle strength Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Death Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs sham rPMS plus rehabilitation | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Active rPMS plus rehabilitation compared with rehabilitation only in stroke
Population: people with stroke
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living (ADLs) Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Upper limb function Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Lower limb function Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (elbow) Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (wrist) Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Muscle strength Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Death Active rPMS plus rehabilitation vs rehabilitation only | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
rPMS compared with any type of control intervention in stroke
Population: people with stroke
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living (ADLs) rPMS vs any type of control intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Upper limb function rPMS vs any type of control intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Lower limb function ‐ not measured rPMS vs any type of control intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Spasticity (elbow) rPMS vs any type of control intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Spasticity (wrist) rPMS vs any type of control intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Muscle strength rPMS vs any type of control intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 18 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Death ‐ not reported rPMS vs any type of control intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |