Cochrane · systematic review · CD011887
Action observation for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke
Borges, LRDM, Fernandes, ABGS, Oliveira dos Passos, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 3 · 42.9%Very low 2 · 28.6%Low 2 · 28.6%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Show all 2 versionsAction observation versus control: effect on upper limb rehabilitation after stroke
Population: upper limb rehabilitation after stroke
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Arm function assessed by: Action Research Arm Test, Fugl‐Meyer Assessment, Wolf Motor Function Test Action observation vs control: effect on upper limb rehabilitation after stroke | no estimate extracted | 11 studies · 373 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Hand functionassessed by: Box and Block Test Action observation vs control: effect on upper limb rehabilitation after stroke | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 178 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Dependence on ADLassessed by: Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure Action observation vs control: effect on upper limb rehabilitation after stroke | no estimate extracted | 7 studies · 302 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Quality of lifeassessed by: Stroke Impact Scale Action observation vs control: effect on upper limb rehabilitation after stroke | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 30 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Cortical activation assessed by: fMRI, MEP, EEG Action observation vs control: effect on upper limb rehabilitation after stroke | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 102 participants | Ungraded |
Motor performanceassessed by: Accelerometer, 3‐dimensional motion analysis system, number of acting Action observation vs control: effect on upper limb rehabilitation after stroke | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 91 participants | Ungraded |
Adverse effects Action observation vs control: effect on upper limb rehabilitation after stroke | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 16 participants | Ungraded |