Cochrane · systematic review · CD011424

Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination

Bui, BN, Lensen, SF, Gibreel, A, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library

Gynaecology and Fertility3 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
11
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 21.4%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 35.7%Low 6 · 42.9%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Current version only

Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination

Population: infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
CD011424.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth (primary analysis)
Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure
RR 1.11 [0.78, 1.59]1 study · 210 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy (sensitivity analysis)
Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure
RR 1.71 [1.32, 2.21]8 studies · 1522 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Clinical pregnancy (primary analysis)
Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Clinical pregnancy (sensitivity analysis)
Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure
RR 2.02 [1.67, 2.45]19 studies · 3184 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Pain during the procedure
Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure
no estimate extracted6 studies · 991 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness

Different timing of intentional endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (1)

Population: infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
CD011424.PUB4 (current) · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy: prior cycle vs IUI cycle
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clinical pregnancy: prior cycle vs IUI cycle (primary analysis)
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Clinical pregnancy: prior cycle vs IUI cycle (sensitivity analysis)
RR 1.06 [0.76, 1.46]4 studies · 410 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain during the procedure
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Different timing of intentional endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (2)

Population: infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
CD011424.PUB4 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clinical pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase (primary analysis)
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Clinical pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase (sensitivity analysis)
RR 0.78 [0.31, 1.94]1 study · 110 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain during the procedure (primary analysis)
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain during the procedure (sensitivity analysis)
no estimate extracted1 study · 110 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias

Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination

Population: infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
CD011424.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth (primary analysis)
Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure
RR 1.11 [0.78, 1.59]1 study · 210 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy (sensitivity analysis)
Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure
RR 1.71 [1.32, 2.21]8 studies · 1522 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Clinical pregnancy (primary analysis)
Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Clinical pregnancy (sensitivity analysis)
Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure
RR 2.02 [1.67, 2.45]19 studies · 3184 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Pain during the procedure
Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure
no estimate extracted6 studies · 991 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness

Higher vs lower degree of intentional endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination

Population: infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
CD011424.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy (primary analysis)
Higher vs lower degree of intentional endometrial injury
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: indirectness
Ongoing pregnancy (sensitivity analysis)
Higher vs lower degree of intentional endometrial injury
RR 1.29 [0.71, 2.35]1 study · 332 participantsLow
Downgraded: indirectness
Clinical pregnancy (primary analysis)
Higher vs lower degree of intentional endometrial injury
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: indirectness
Clinical pregnancy (sensitivity analysis)
Higher vs lower degree of intentional endometrial injury
RR 1.15 [0.66, 2.01]1 study · 332 participantsLow
Downgraded: indirectness
Pain during the procedure ‐ not reported
Higher vs lower degree of intentional endometrial injury
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Different timing of intentional endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (1)

Population: infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
CD011424.PUB3 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy: prior cycle vs IUI cycle
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clinical pregnancy: prior cycle vs IUI cycle (primary analysis)
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Clinical pregnancy: prior cycle vs IUI cycle (sensitivity analysis)
RR 1.06 [0.76, 1.46]4 studies · 410 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain during the procedure
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Different timing of intentional endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (2)

Population: infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
CD011424.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clinical pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase (primary analysis)
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Clinical pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase (sensitivity analysis)
RR 0.78 [0.31, 1.94]1 study · 110 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain during the procedure (primary analysis)
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain during the procedure (sensitivity analysis)
no estimate extracted1 study · 110 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias

Intentional endometrial injury vs. either no intervention or a sham procedure

Population: women trying to get pregnant from intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
CD011424.PUB2 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy
Intentional endometrial injury vs either no intervention or a sham procedure
RR 2.22 [1.56, 3.15]6 studies · 950 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy ‐ sensitivity
Intentional endometrial injury vs either no intervention or a sham procedure
RR 2.64 [1.03, 6.82]1 study · 105 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Pain during the procedure
Intentional endometrial injury vs either no intervention or a sham procedure
no estimate extracted1 study · 1 participantsUngraded
Clinical pregnancy
Intentional endometrial injury vs either no intervention or a sham procedure
RR 1.98 [1.51, 2.58]8 studies · 1180 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Higher vs. lower degree of intentional endometrial injury

Population: women trying to get pregnant from intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
CD011424.PUB2 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy
Higher vs lower degree of intentional endometrial injury
RR 1.29 [0.71, 2.35]1 study · 332 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Pain during the procedure
Higher vs lower degree of intentional endometrial injury
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Clinical pregnancy
Higher vs lower degree of intentional endometrial injury
RR 1.15 [0.66, 2.01]1 study · 332 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness

Different timing of intentional endometrial injury

Population: women trying to get pregnant from intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
CD011424.PUB2 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy
RR 0.65 [0.37, 1.16]1 study · 176 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Pain during the procedure
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Clinical pregnancy
RR 0.82 [0.5, 1.36]2 studies · 276 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness