Cochrane · systematic review · CD010698
Capnography versus standard monitoring for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia
Wall, BF, Magee, K, Campbell, SG, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
Emergency and Critical CareAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 16.7%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 5 · 83.3%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Capnography and standard monitoring compared with standard monitoring for emergency department patients undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia
Population: patients undergoing PSA
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Oxygen desaturation Capnography and standard monitoring vs standard monitoring | RR 0.89 [0.48, 1.63] | 3 studies · 1272 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Hypotension Capnography and standard monitoring vs standard monitoring | RR 2.36 [0.98, 5.69] | 1 study · 986 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Emesis, pulmonary aspiration Capnography and standard monitoring vs standard monitoring | RR 3.1 [0.13, 75.88] | 1 study · 986 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Airway interventions Capnography and standard monitoring vs standard monitoring | RR 1.26 [0.94, 1.69] | 3 studies · 1272 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Airway interventions adult subgroup analysis (aged ≥ 18 years)h Capnography and standard monitoring vs standard monitoring | RR 1.44 [1.16, 1.79] | 2 studies · 1118 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Recovery time Capnography and standard monitoring vs standard monitoring | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |