Cochrane · systematic review · CD010577
Interventions for treating gas gangrene
Yang, Z, Hu, J, Qu, Y, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library
WoundsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
2
current version
GRADE rated
2
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Summary of findings. Additional Chinese herbs compared with no additional Chinese herbs for treating gas gangrene
Population: patients with gas gangrene
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Cure rate Summary of findings. Additional Chinese herbs vs no additional Chinese herbs | RR 3.08 [1, 9.46] | 1 study · 46 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Summary of findings. Additional topical HBOT compared with additional systemic HBOT for treating gas gangrene
Population: patients with gas gangrene
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Cure rate Summary of findings. Additional topical HBOT vs additional systemic HBOT | RR 1.1 [0.25, 4.84] | 1 study · 44 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |