Cochrane · systematic review · CD010515

Personally tailored activities for improving psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia in community settings

Möhler, R, Renom, A, Renom, H, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2020 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 7 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Personally tailored activities compared to control for people with dementia living in the community

Population: people with dementia
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Challenging behaviour (
Personally tailored activities vs control
no estimate extracted4 studies · 305 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life of people with dementia (
Personally tailored activities vs control
no estimate extracted2 studies · 86 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Depression (
Personally tailored activities vs control
no estimate extracted2 studies · 96 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Affect (
Personally tailored activities vs control
no estimate extracted1 study · 160 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Caregiver depression (
Personally tailored activities vs control
no estimate extracted3 studies · 256 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Caregiver burden (
Personally tailored activities vs control
no estimate extracted3 studies · 246 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Caregiver's quality of life (
Personally tailored activities vs control
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision