Cochrane · systematic review · CD010472

Device‐modified trabeculectomy for glaucoma

Park, J, Rittiphairoj, T, Wang, X, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

Eyes and Vision2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 28.6%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 42.9%Low 2 · 28.6%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Device‐modified trabeculectomy compared with standard trabeculectomy for people with open‐angle glaucoma

Population: people with glaucoma
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Postoperative mean IOP at 1 year
Device‐modified trabeculectomy vs standard trabeculectomy
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Postoperative mean change in IOP from baseline to 1 year
Device‐modified trabeculectomy vs standard trabeculectomy
MD 2NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Postoperative mean logMAR BCVA at 1 year
Device‐modified trabeculectomy vs standard trabeculectomy
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Postoperative mean visual field change at 1 year
Device‐modified trabeculectomy vs standard trabeculectomy
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life at 1 year
Device‐modified trabeculectomy vs standard trabeculectomy
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Proportion of participants who were drop‐free at 1 year
Device‐modified trabeculectomy vs standard trabeculectomy
RR 2.04 [0.42, 9.82]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Proportion of participants with endophthalmitis
Device‐modified trabeculectomy vs standard trabeculectomy
RR 0.34 [0.01, 8.29]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision