Cochrane · systematic review · CD010392
Face‐to‐face interventions for promoting physical activity
Richards, J, Hillsdon, M, Thorogood, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
HeartAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 2 · 40%High 3 · 60%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Face‐to‐face interventions versus control for promoting physical activity
Population: patients with promoting physical activity
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Cardio‐respiratory fitness: 12 months Sub maximal assessment of cardio‐respiratory fitness Face‐to‐face interventions vs control | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 426 participants | Moderate |
Dichotomous outcomes: 12 months Self‐reported PA questionnaire Face‐to‐face interventions vs control | OR 1.58 [0.91, 2.75] | 3 studies · 3261 participants | High |
Dichotomous outcomes: 24 months Self‐reported PA questionnaire Face‐to‐face interventions vs control | OR 1.19 [1.02, 1.39] | 1 study · 2701 participants | High |
Self‐reported physical activity: 24 months Self‐reported PA questionnaire Face‐to‐face interventions vs control | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 4235 participants | High |
Self‐reported physical activity: 12 months Self‐reported PA questionnaire Face‐to‐face interventions vs control | no estimate extracted | 8 studies · 23825 participants | Moderate |