Cochrane · systematic review · CD010200
Interventions for improving community ambulation in individuals with stroke
Barclay, RE, Stevenson, TJ, Poluha, W, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library
StrokeAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 6 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Community ambulation intervention compared with other interventions for improving community ambulation in stroke survivors
Population: adult stroke survivors
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Participation Nottingham Leisure Questionnaire (0 to 60) and Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (0 to 40) Community ambulation intervention vs other interventions | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 198 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Community Walk Test Community walk test (time multiplied by level of walking aid) Community ambulation intervention vs other interventions | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 45 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Walking Ability Questionnaire Walking Ability Questionnaire (0 to 76) Community ambulation intervention vs other interventions | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 45 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Gait speed m/s Community ambulation intervention vs other interventions | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 98 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Six‐Minute Walk Test Six‐Minute Walk Test (metres) Community ambulation intervention vs other interventions | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 55 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Self‐efficacy Activities Specific Balance Confidence Scale (0 to 100) and Falls Efficacy Scale (0 to 130) Community ambulation intervention vs other interventions | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 97 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |