Cochrane · systematic review · CD009812
Personally tailored activities for improving psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia in long‐term care
Möhler, R, Calo, S, Renom, A, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 1 · 14.3%Very low 2 · 28.6%Low 3 · 42.9%Moderate 1 · 14.3%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Current version onlyPersonally tailored activities compared to usual care or non‐personalised activities for people with dementia
Population: people with dementia
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Agitation ( Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities | no estimate extracted | 7 studies · 485 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of life (self‐rating by the participants; Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 42 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Quality of life (proxy‐rating; Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 177 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Adverse events; Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 188 participants | Ungraded |
Positive affect ( Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 498 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Negative affect ( Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 632 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Mood ( Personally tailored activities vs usual care or non‐personalised activities | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 265 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Personally tailored activities compared to usual care or unspecific activities for people with dementia
Population: people with dementia
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Quality of life (self‐rating by the participants; Personally tailored activities vs usual care or unspecific activities | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 42 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Quality of life (proxy‐rating; Personally tailored activities vs usual care or unspecific activities | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 139 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Challenging behaviour ( Personally tailored activities vs usual care or unspecific activities | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 439 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Adverse events; Personally tailored activities vs usual care or unspecific activities | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 2 participants | Ungraded |
Positive affect ( Personally tailored activities vs usual care or unspecific activities | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 455 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Negative affect ( Personally tailored activities vs usual care or unspecific activities | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 589 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Mood ( Personally tailored activities vs usual care or unspecific activities | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 247 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |