Cochrane · systematic review · CD009688

Interventions for the symptoms and signs resulting from jellyfish stings

McGee, RG, Webster, AC, Lewis, SR, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
10
No studies
4
Included studies
NR
No studies 4 · 28.6%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 10 · 71.4%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Application of heat versus application of cold for the symptoms and signs resulting from jellyfish stings

Population: people stung accidentally by bluebottle jellyfish (Physalia) and box jellyfish that do not cause Irukandji syndrome (Hawaiian box jellyfish (Carybdea alata) and major box jellyfish (Chironex fleckeri))
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
At least a clinically significant reduction in pain within 6 hours Reported in studies as: clinically improved or reduced pain,a or cessation of pain at end of treatmentb
Application of heat vs application of cold
RR 2.25 [1.42, 3.56]2 studies · 142 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events due to treatment Minor adverse events, reported in studies as: exacerbation in pain after treatment; burn as a result of hot‐water immersion, or transient erythema, or adverse effects due to application of ice
Application of heat vs application of cold
RR 0.5 [0.05, 5.19]2 studies · 142 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Clinically significant reduction in pain at 0 to 1 hour Reported in studies as: clinically improved or reduced paina
Application of heat vs application of cold
RR 2.66 [1.71, 4.15]1 study · 88 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Cessation of pain at end of treatmentb
Application of heat vs application of cold
RR 1.63 [0.81, 3.27]1 study · 54 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Retreatment with the same intervention
Application of heat vs application of cold
RR 0.19 [0.01, 3.9]1 study · 96 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Retreatment with the alternative treatment (heat or cold application) at 0 to 1 hour
Application of heat vs application of cold
RR 1 [0.55, 1.82]1 study · 54 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Dermatological signs up to 1 week after the sting Reported in studies as: itchiness, red mark, or rash
Application of heat vs application of cold
RR 1.02 [0.63, 1.65]2 studies · 98 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Topical applications for the symptoms and signs resulting from jellyfish stings

Population: people stung accidentally by box jellyfish that do not cause Irukandji syndrome (Hawaiian box jellyfish; Carybdea alata) and healthy volunteers stung by Indonesian sea nettle jellyfish (Chrysaora chinensis)
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
At least a clinically significant reduction in pain within 6 hours Reported in study as complete cessation of pain.a
no estimate extracted1 study · 62 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events due to treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 97 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Clinically significant reduction in pain
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Cessation of pain at end of treatmenta
no estimate extracted1 study · 62 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Retreatment with the same intervention at 0 to 1 hour
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Retreatment with the alternative intervention at 0 to 1 hour
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Dermatological signs up to 1 week after the sting
no estimate extractedNRNo studies