Cochrane · systematic review · CD009524

Latrepirdine for Alzheimer's disease

Chau, S, Herrmann, N, Ruthirakuhan, MT, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
10
current version
GRADE rated
9
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 1 · 10%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 40%Moderate 4 · 40%High 1 · 10%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings for efficacy measures

Population: patients with Alzheimer's disease
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
CIBIC‐Plus (change from baseline at 26 weeks) Scale: 1 to 7 (1 = very much improved, 4 = no change, 7 = very much worse)
no estimate extracted1 study · 183 participantsLow
ADAS‐Cog Scale from: 1 to 70 (higher scores represent worse performance)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1243 participantsLow
MMSE Scale from: 0 to 30 (higher scores represent better performance)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1243 participantsLow
ADCS‐ADL Scale from: 0 to 54 (higher scores represent better performance)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1243 participantsLow
NPI Scale from: 0 to 144 (higher scores represent worse performance)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1243 participantsHigh

Summary of findings for safety and tolerability

Population: patients with Alzheimer's disease
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adverse events
RR 1.03 [0.93, 1.14]4 studies · 1034 participantsModerate
Serious adverse events
RR 0.86 [0.55, 1.35]4 studies · 1034 participantsModerate
Total dropouts
RR 0.91 [0.65, 1.27]4 studies · 1034 participantsModerate
Dropouts due to adverse events
RR 0.98 [0.57, 1.67]3 studies · 1010 participantsModerate
publication bias
no estimate extracted1 participantsUngraded