Cochrane · systematic review · CD009461

Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities

Bosteels, J, van Wessel, S, Weyers, S, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library

Gynaecology and Fertility3 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
8
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
5
Included studies
NR
No studies 5 · 62.5%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 25%Low 1 · 12.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Current version only

Operative hysteroscopy versus control in women with otherwise unexplained subfertility and suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities

Population: women with submucous fibroids and otherwise unexplained subfertility
CD009461.PUB4 (current) · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events: hysteroscopy complications
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clinical pregnancya Ultrasound 12 months
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
OR 2.44 [0.97, 6.17]1 study · 94 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events: miscarriaged Ultrasound 12 months
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
OR 1.54 [0.47, 5]1 study · 94 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Operative hysteroscopy versus control in women undergoing medically assisted reproduction with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities

Population: subfertile women with endometrial polyps diagnosed by ultrasonography prior to treatment with gonadotropin and intrauterine insemination
CD009461.PUB4 (current) · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events: hysteroscopy complications
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clinical pregnancya Ultrasound 4 intrauterine insemination cycles
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
OR 4.41 [2.45, 7.96]1 study · 204 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events: miscarriage
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Operative hysteroscopy compared with control for unexplained subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities

Population: women with submucous fibroids and otherwise unexplained subfertility
CD009461.PUB3 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Hysteroscopy complications
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clinical pregnancy ultrasound1 12 months
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
OR 2.44 [0.97, 6.17]1 study · 94 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Miscarriage ultrasound5 12 months
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
OR 0.58 [0.12, 2.8]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Operative hysteroscopy compared with control for suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities prior to medically assisted reproduction

Population: subfertile women with endometrial polyps diagnosed by ultrasonography prior to treatment with gonadotropin and intrauterine insemination
CD009461.PUB3 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Hysteroscopy complications
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clinical pregnancy ultrasound1 4 IUI cycles
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
OR 4.41 [2.45, 7.96]1 study · 204 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Miscarriage
Operative hysteroscopy vs control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Comparison

Population: women with submucous fibroids and otherwise unexplained subfertility
CD009461.PUB2 · 2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Clinical pregnancy ultrasound1 12 months
OR 2.44 [0.97, 6.17]1 study · 94 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Miscarriage ultrasound5 12 months
OR 1.54 [0.71, 5]1 study · 94 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Comparison

Population: subfertile women with endometrial polyps diagnosed by ultrasonography prior to treatment with gonadotropin and intrauterine insemination
CD009461.PUB2 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Clinical pregnancy ultrasound1 4 IUI cycles
OR 4.41 [2.45, 7.96]1 study · 204 participantsHigh