Cochrane · systematic review · CD009099
Hydrocolloid dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers
Dumville, JC, Deshpande, S, O'Meara, S, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
3
current version
GRADE rated
1
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 2 · 66.7%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Show all 2 versionsFibrous‐hydrocolloid (hydrofibre) dressing compared to basic wound contact dressing for healing diabetic foot ulcers
Population: patients with healing diabetic foot ulcers
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Number of ulcers healed Fibrous‐hydrocolloid (hydrofibre) dressing vs basic wound contact dressing | RR 1.01 [0.74, 1.38] | 2 studies · 229 participants | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |
HRQoL Fibrous‐hydrocolloid (hydrofibre) dressing vs basic wound contact dressing | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Adverse events Fibrous‐hydrocolloid (hydrofibre) dressing vs basic wound contact dressing | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |