Cochrane · systematic review · CD007911

Cryotherapy following total knee replacement

Aggarwal, A, Adie, S, Harris, IA, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

Musculoskeletal2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 57.1%Low 3 · 42.9%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Current version only

Any cold therapy compared with no cold therapy following total knee replacement

Population: people undergoing total knee replacement
CD007911.PUB3 (current) · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Blood lossTime point: mean 48 hours, range 1 to 13 days. Higher blood loss indicates a worse outcome.
Any cold therapy vs no cold therapy following total knee replacement
no estimate extracted12 studies · 956 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Pain at post‐operative day 2Scale from 0 (best) to 10 (worst).
Any cold therapy vs no cold therapy following total knee replacement
no estimate extracted6 studies · 530 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Transfusion rate
Any cold therapy vs no cold therapy following total knee replacement
RR 2.13 [0.04, 109.63]2 studies · 91 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Range of motion at dischargeScale from 0 (worst) to 125 (best).
Any cold therapy vs no cold therapy following total knee replacement
no estimate extracted3 studies · 174 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Function Standardised scale with positive score indicating a better outcome. Scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Any cold therapy vs no cold therapy following total knee replacement
no estimate extracted4 studies · 296 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Total adverse eventsAdverse events included discomfort, local skin reactions, superficial infections, cold‐induced injuries and thrombolytic events.
Any cold therapy vs no cold therapy following total knee replacement
RR 1.3 [0.53, 3.2]16 studies · 1199 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Withdrawals due to adverse events
Any cold therapy vs no cold therapy following total knee replacement
RR 2.71 [0.42, 17.38]19 studies · 1347 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness

Any cold therapy compared to any control for patients undergoing total knee replacement

Population: patients with patients undergoing total knee replacement
CD007911.PUB2 · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Blood loss
Any cold therapy vs any control
no estimate extracted10 studies · 666 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain at post‐operative day 2 Scale from: 0 to 10.
Any cold therapy vs any control
no estimate extracted4 studies · 322 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events Adverse events included discomfort, local skin reactions, superficial infections, cold induced injuries and thrombolytic events
Any cold therapy vs any control
RR 0.98 [0.28, 3.47]11 studies · 675 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Range of motion at discharge Scale from: 0 to 125.
Any cold therapy vs any control
no estimate extracted2 studies · 107 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Transfusion rate
Any cold therapy vs any control
RR 2.13 [0.04, 109.63]2 studies · 91 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Function ‐ not measured
Any cold therapy vs any control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies