Cochrane · systematic review · CD007210
Maintenance treatments for opiate ‐dependent adolescents
Minozzi, S, Amato, L, Bellisario, C, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library
Drugs and AlcoholAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Buprenorphine maintenance compared to buprenorphine detoxification for opiate‐dependent adolescents
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Drop‐outs Number of participants who did not complete the study Buprenorphine maintenance vs buprenorphine detoxification | RR 0.37 [0.26, 0.54] | 1 study · 152 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Use of primary substance Patients with positive urine test at the end of treatment Buprenorphine maintenance vs buprenorphine detoxification | RR 0.97 [0.78, 1.22] | 1 study · 152 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Self reported use at 12‐month Buprenorphine maintenance vs buprenorphine detoxification | RR 0.73 [0.57, 0.95] | 1 study · 152 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Enrolment in addiction treatment at 12‐month Buprenorphine maintenance vs buprenorphine detoxification | RR 1.33 [0.94, 1.88] | 1 study · 152 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |