Cochrane · systematic review · CD007205

Lateral positioning for critically ill adult patients

Hewitt, N, Bucknall, T, Faraone, NM · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

Emergency and Critical CareAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
9
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
4
Included studies
NR
No studies 4 · 44.4%Ungraded 2 · 22.2%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 33.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Lateral positioning compared with supine immobilization

Population: critically ill adult patients
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality ‐ not measured
Lateral positioning vs supine immobilization
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Morbiditya ‐ not reported
Lateral positioning vs supine immobilization
no estimate extracted2 studies · 85 participantsUngraded

Right lateral position compared with left lateral position

Population: critically ill adult patients
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hypoxaemiaa Partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) < 60 mmHg
Right lateral position vs left lateral position
no estimate extracted2 studies · 70 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias
Hypotensione ‐ not reported
Right lateral position vs left lateral position
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Profound hypertensiong ‐ not reported
Right lateral position vs left lateral position
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low oxygen delivery (DO2)h ‐ not reported
Right lateral position vs left lateral position
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Global indicators of tissue oxygenation impairmentj Mixed venous saturation (SvO2) < 60%
Right lateral position vs left lateral position
no estimate extracted3 studies · 103 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias

Bad lung down compared with good lung down for critically ill patients with unilateral lung disease

Population: critically ill adult patients with unilateral lung disease
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hypoxaemia PaO2 < 60 mmHg
Bad lung down vs good lung down
no estimate extracted2 studies · 19 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias
Global indicators of tissue oxygenation impairment Arterial‐venous oxygen content difference (C(a‐v)O2) ‐ not reported
Bad lung down vs good lung down
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsUngraded