Cochrane · systematic review · CD006306

Antipsychotic medications for cocaine dependence

Indave, BI, Minozzi, S, Pani, PP, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

Drugs and AlcoholAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 80%Moderate 1 · 20%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Any antipsychotic versus placebo for cocaine dependence (Update)

Population: people with cocaine dependence
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dropouts Number of participants who dropped out from the study
Any antipsychotic vs placebo
RR 0.75 [0.57, 0.97]8 studies · 397 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Side effects Number of participants with at least i side effect
Any antipsychotic vs placebo
RR 1.01 [0.93, 1.1]6 studies · 291 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Number of participants using cocaine during the treatment (as days/week by urine tests or self report) Number of participants that reported the use of cocaine during the treatment
Any antipsychotic vs placebo
RR 1.02 [0.65, 1.62]2 studies · 91 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Continuous abstinence (number of participants who maintained negative drug screens for 2 ‐ 3 weeks) Number of participants that maintained negative cocaine screens for at least 2 ‐ 3 weeks
Any antipsychotic vs placebo
RR 1.3 [0.73, 2.32]3 studies · 139 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Craving (Brief Substance Craving Scale) Brief Substance Craving Scale. Scale from: 0 to 4.
Any antipsychotic vs placebo
no estimate extracted4 studies · 240 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency