Cochrane · systematic review · CD004956

Bisphosphonates for Paget's disease of bone in adults

Corral‐Gudino, L, Tan, AJH, del Pino‐Montes, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

MusculoskeletalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 7 · 50%Very low 3 · 21.4%Low 3 · 21.4%Moderate 1 · 7.1%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Bisphosphonates versus placebo for Paget's disease of bone

Population: Paget's disease of bone
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of participants with change in bone pain (disappearance of pain)¹assessed on VAS
Bisphosphonates vs placebo
RR 3.42 [1.31, 8.9]2 studies · 205 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Number of participants who experienced radiologically‐confirmed fractures
Bisphosphonates vs placebo
RR 0.89 [0.18, 4.31]4 studies · 356 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Number of participants who needed orthopaedic surgery (not measured)
Bisphosphonates vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Number of participants with change in quality of life measures (not measured)
Bisphosphonates vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Number of participants with change in hearing thresholds (not measured)
Bisphosphonates vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Number of participants who experienced side effects related to use of bisphosphonates
Bisphosphonates vs placebo
RR 1.32 [0.91, 1.92]6 studies · 678 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Number of participants who withdrew due to adverse events
Bisphosphonates vs placebo
RR 1.01 [0.41, 2.52]6 studies · 517 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Zoledronate versus pamidronate or risedronate for Paget's disease of bone

Population: Paget's disease of bone
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of participants with change in bone pain¹ assessed on VAS.
Zoledronate vs pamidronate or risedronate
RR 1.31 [1.15, 1.51]2 studies · 436 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Number of participants who experienced fractures (not measured)
Zoledronate vs pamidronate or risedronate
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Number of participants who needed orthopaedic surgery (not measured)
Zoledronate vs pamidronate or risedronate
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Number of participants with change in quality of life measures (not measured)
Zoledronate vs pamidronate or risedronate
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Number of participants with change in hearing thresholds (not measured)
Zoledronate vs pamidronate or risedronate
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Number of participants who experienced side effects related to use of bisphosphonates.
Zoledronate vs pamidronate or risedronate
RR 1.05 [0.95, 1.16]2 studies · 437 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Number of participants who withdrew due to adverse events (withdrawals)
Zoledronate vs pamidronate or risedronate
RR 2.04 [0.43, 9.59]2 studies · 437 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness