Cochrane · systematic review · CD004127

Noninvasive positive‐pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy for intubated adults with respiratory failure

Burns, KEA, Meade, MO, Premji, A, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library

Emergency and Critical CareAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 50%Moderate 3 · 50%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Noninvasive versus invasive weaning for intubated adults with respiratory failure

Population: intubated adults with respiratory failure
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality—COPD
Noninvasive vs invasive weaning
RR 0.36 [0.24, 0.56]9 studies · 632 participantsModerate
Mortality—mixed
Noninvasive vs invasive weaning
RR 0.81 [0.47, 1.4]7 studies · 362 participantsLow

Noninvasive versus invasive weaning for intubated adults with respiratory failure

Population: patients with intubated adults with respiratory failure
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Weaning failure
Noninvasive vs invasive weaning
RR 0.63 [0.42, 0.96]8 studies · 605 participantsModerate
Nosocomial pneumonia
Noninvasive vs invasive weaning
RR 0.25 [0.15, 0.43]14 studies · 953 participantsLow
Average duration of ventilation related to weaning
Noninvasive vs invasive weaning
no estimate extracted9 studies · 645 participantsLow
Downgraded: inconsistency
Reintubation
Noninvasive vs invasive weaning
RR 0.65 [0.44, 0.97]10 studies · 789 participantsModerate