Cochrane · systematic review · CD004019
Osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis
Brouwer, RW, Huizinga, MR, Duivenvoorden, T, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library
MusculoskeletalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
8
Included studies
NR
No studies 8 · 57.1%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 14.3%Low 4 · 28.6%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Other types of high tibial osteotomy (aHTO) compared with closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) for people with knee osteoarthritis
Population: people with knee osteoarthritis
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Treatment failure rate Other types of high tibial osteotomy (aHTO) vs closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Pain Other types of high tibial osteotomy (aHTO) vs closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 216 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Function Other types of high tibial osteotomy (aHTO) vs closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 216 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Health‐related quality of life measures Other types of high tibial osteotomy (aHTO) vs closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Serious adverse events Other types of high tibial osteotomy (aHTO) vs closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) | RR 2.49 [0.64, 9.75] | 4 studies · 265 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Mortality Other types of high tibial osteotomy (aHTO) vs closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Reoperation rate Other types of high tibial osteotomy (aHTO) vs closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) | RR 2.58 [1.49, 4.45] | 4 studies · 224 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) compared with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for people with knee osteoarthritis
Population: people with knee osteoarthritis
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Treatment failure rate Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) vs unicompartmental knee arthroplasty | RR 1.32 [0.94, 1.87] | 1 study · 60 participants | Very low |
Pain Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) vs unicompartmental knee arthroplasty | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Function Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) vs unicompartmental knee arthroplasty | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Health‐related quality of life measures Participant opinion: improvement Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) vs unicompartmental knee arthroplasty | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Adverse events Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) vs unicompartmental knee arthroplasty | RR 0.25 [0.06, 1.08] | 1 study · 60 participants | Very low |
Mortality Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) vs unicompartmental knee arthroplasty | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Reoperation rate Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW‐HTO) vs unicompartmental knee arthroplasty | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |