Cochrane · systematic review · CD003380
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), third‐wave CBT and interpersonal therapy (IPT) based interventions for preventing depression in children and adolescents
Hetrick, SE, Cox, GR, Witt, KG, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
Common Mental DisordersAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 16.7%Low 1 · 16.7%Moderate 4 · 66.7%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Evidence‐based psychological interventions versus any comparator for depression diagnosis at the medium‐term follow‐up
Population: children and adolescents
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Evidence‐based psychological interventions versus any comparator (Overall) ‐ effect on diagnosis of depression The assumed risk is based on control group rates of depression diagnosis at medium‐term Evidence‐based psychological interventions vs any comparator | RR 0.84 [0.72, 0.97] | NR | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Evidence‐based psychological interventions versus any comparator (Targeted programmes) ‐ effect on diagnosis of depression The assumed risk is based on control group rates of depression diagnosis at medium‐term Evidence‐based psychological interventions vs any comparator | RR 0.82 [0.68, 0.99] | NR | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness |
Evidence‐based psychological interventions versus any comparator (Universal programmes) ‐ effect on diagnosis of depression The assumed risk is based on control group rates of depression diagnosis at medium‐term Evidence‐based psychological interventions vs any comparator | RR 0.87 [0.66, 1.14] | NR | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Evidence‐based psychological interventions versus any comparator for self‐reported depression scores at the post‐intervention assessment
Population: children and adolescents
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Evidence‐based psychological interventions versus any comparator (Overall) ‐ self‐rated depression scores (higher score is equivalent to a poorer outcome) Evidence‐based psychological interventions vs any comparator | no estimate extracted | 73 studies · 13829 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Evidence‐based psychological interventions versus any comparator (Targeted ‐ self‐rated depression scores (higher score is equivalent to a poorer outcome)) Evidence‐based psychological interventions vs any comparator | no estimate extracted | 42 studies · 4816 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Evidence‐based psychological interventions versus any comparator (Universal programmes) ‐ self‐rated depression scores (higher score is equivalent to a poorer outcome) Evidence‐based psychological interventions vs any comparator | no estimate extracted | 31 studies · 9013 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |