Cochrane · systematic review · CD003154

Memantine for dementia

McShane, R, Westby, MJ, Roberts, E, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
18
current version
GRADE rated
16
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 11.1%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 5 · 27.8%Moderate 3 · 16.7%High 8 · 44.4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Moderate‐to‐severe AD, six to seven months

Population: Alzheimer's disease (AD), moderate‐to‐severe
9 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Clinical Global (CIBIC+)
no estimate extracted10 studies · 2797 participantsHigh
Cognitive Function (SIB)
no estimate extracted13 studies · 3337 participantsHigh
Functional performance on activities of daily living: ADCS‐ADL19 54‐point scale
no estimate extracted11 studies · 2687 participantsHigh
Behaviour and Mood (NPI)
no estimate extracted14 studies · 3674 participantsHigh
Binary outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
All‐cause discontinuation
no estimate extracted17 studies · 5087 participantsHigh
Number suffering at least one adverse event
no estimate extracted29 studies · 8033 participantsHigh
Number suffering at least one serious adverse event
no estimate extracted19 studies · 6482 participantsHigh
Number suffering agitation as an adverse event
no estimate extracted12 studies · 4395 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency

Vascular dementia ‐ mild‐to‐moderate severity. six months

Population: vascular dementia, mild‐to‐moderate severity
9 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Clinical Global: (CIBIC+)
no estimate extracted2 studies · 757 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Cognitive function: ADAS‐Cog 70‐point scale
no estimate extracted2 studies · 569 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Performance on ADL (NOSGER self care subscale) Subscale 5 points
no estimate extracted2 studies · 542 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Behaviour: NOSGER disturbing behaviour subscale Subscale 5 points
no estimate extracted2 studies · 542 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Binary outcomes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
All‐cause discontinuation
no estimate extracted2 studies · 900 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Number suffering at least one adverse event
no estimate extracted29 studies · 8033 participantsHigh
Number suffering at least one serious adverse event
no estimate extracted2 studies · 900 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Number suffering agitation as an adverse event
no estimate extracted2 studies · 900 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency