Cochrane · systematic review · CD001816

Oral immunoglobulin for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm and low birth weight neonates

Foster, JP, Seth, R, Cole, MJ · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

NeonatalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 66.7%Low 2 · 33.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings table for oral immunoglobulin versus control

Population: preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm and low birth weight neonates
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Definite necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) during study period
Summary of findings table for oral immunoglobulin vs control
RR 0.84 [0.57, 1.25]3 studies · 1840 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Definite necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) during study period ‐ IgA/IgG
Summary of findings table for oral immunoglobulin vs control
RR 0.08 [0, 1.39]1 study · 179 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Definite necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) during study period ‐ IgG
Summary of findings table for oral immunoglobulin vs control
RR 0.95 [0.63, 1.42]2 studies · 1661 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Definite NEC after study period
Summary of findings table for oral immunoglobulin vs control
RR 1.3 [0.47, 3.6]2 studies · 1661 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
NEC‐related surgery during study period
Summary of findings table for oral immunoglobulin vs control
RR 0.21 [0.02, 1.75]2 studies · 311 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
NEC‐related deaths during study period
Summary of findings table for oral immunoglobulin vs control
RR 1.1 [0.47, 2.59]3 studies · 1840 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias