Cochrane · systematic review · CD001768
Follow‐up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer
Moschetti, I, Cinquini, M, Lambertini, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
Breast CancerAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 16.7%Moderate 2 · 33.3%High 3 · 50%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Summary of findings: Non‐intensive versus intensive follow‐up for women treated for early breast cancer
Population: women treated for early breast cancer
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Overall survival Summary of findings: Non‐intensive vs intensive follow‐up | HR 0.98 [0.84, 1.15] | 2 studies · 2563 participants | High |
Disease‐free survival Summary of findings: Non‐intensive vs intensive follow‐up | HR 0.84 [0.71, 1] | 2 studies · 2563 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Quality of life4 Summary of findings: Non‐intensive vs intensive follow‐up | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 639 participants | High |
Summary of findings: Decentralised versus centralised follow‐up for women treated for early breast cancer
Population: women treated for early breast cancer
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Overall survival Summary of findings: Decentralised vs centralised follow‐up | HR 1.07 [0.64, 1.78] | 1 study · 968 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Disease‐free survival Summary of findings: Decentralised vs centralised follow‐up | HR 1.06 [0.76, 1.47] | 2 studies · 1264 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of life5 Summary of findings: Decentralised vs centralised follow‐up | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 356 participants | High |