Cochrane · systematic review · CD001555

Treatment for inclusion body myositis

Rose, MR, Jones, K, Leong, K, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

NeuromuscularAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
36
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
19
Included studies
NR
No studies 19 · 52.8%Ungraded 12 · 33.3%Very low 1 · 2.8%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 4 · 11.1%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Intravenous immunoglobulin versus placebo for inclusion body myositis

Population: people with inclusion body myositis
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in muscle strength at 6 months (%)
Intravenous immunoglobulin vs placebo
no estimate extracted3 studies · 78 participantsUngraded
Change in muscle strength at 12 months (%) ‐ not measured
Intravenous immunoglobulin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in muscle mass at 6 months (%) ‐ not measured
Intravenous immunoglobulin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in handgrip strength at 6 months (%) ‐ not measured
Intravenous immunoglobulin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in timed walk at 6 months (%) e.g. 10‐metre or 6‐minute walk test at 6 months ‐ not measured
Intravenous immunoglobulin vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Significant adverse events
Intravenous immunoglobulin vs placebo
no estimate extracted3 studies · 78 participantsUngraded

Interferon beta‐1a compared to placebo for inclusion body myositis

Population: people with inclusion body myositis
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in muscle strength at 6 months (normalised MMT score ‐ see Characteristics of Studies table)
Interferon beta‐1a vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 58 participantsModerate
Change in muscle strength at 12 months (%) ‐ not measured
Interferon beta‐1a vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in muscle mass at 6 months (%)
Interferon beta‐1a vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 58 participantsModerate
Change in handgrip strength at 6 months (%)
Interferon beta‐1a vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 58 participantsUngraded
Change in timed walk at 6 months (%) e.g. 10‐metre or 6‐minute walk test at 6 months ‐ not measured
Interferon beta‐1a vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Significant adverse events
Interferon beta‐1a vs placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 58 participantsUngraded

Methotrexate compared to placebo for inclusion body myositis

Population: people with inclusion body myositis
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in muscle strength at 6 months (%)
Methotrexate vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 44 participantsUngraded
Change in muscle strength at 12 months (%) ‐ MMT
Methotrexate vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 44 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Change in muscle mass at 6 months (%) ‐ not measured
Methotrexate vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in handgrip strength at 6 months (%) ‐ not measured
Methotrexate vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in timed walk at 6 months (%) e.g. 10‐metre or 6‐minute walk test at 6 months ‐ not measured
Methotrexate vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Significant adverse events
Methotrexate vs placebo
RR 8.76 [1.19, 64.28]1 study · 44 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Methotrexate and anti‐T lymphocyte immunoglobulin compared to methotrexate for inclusion body myositis

Population: people with inclusion body myositis
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in muscle strength at 6 months (%)
Methotrexate and anti‐T lymphocyte immunoglobulin vs methotrexate
no estimate extracted1 study · 11 participantsUngraded
Change in muscle strength at 12 months (%) ‐ QMT
Methotrexate and anti‐T lymphocyte immunoglobulin vs methotrexate
no estimate extracted1 study · 11 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Change in muscle mass at 12 months (%) ‐ not measured
Methotrexate and anti‐T lymphocyte immunoglobulin vs methotrexate
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in handgrip strength at 6 months (%)
Methotrexate and anti‐T lymphocyte immunoglobulin vs methotrexate
no estimate extracted1 study · 11 participantsUngraded
Change in timed walk at 6 months (%) e.g. 10‐metre or 6‐minute walk test at 6 months ‐ not measured
Methotrexate and anti‐T lymphocyte immunoglobulin vs methotrexate
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Significant adverse events
Methotrexate and anti‐T lymphocyte immunoglobulin vs methotrexate
no estimate extracted1 study · 11 participantsUngraded

Methotrexate and azathioprine compared to methotrexate (plus leucovorin) for inclusion body myositis

Population: people with inclusion body myositis
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in muscle strength at 6 months (%)
Methotrexate and azathioprine vs methotrexate (plus leucovorin)
no estimate extracted1 study · 11 participantsUngraded
Change in muscle strength at 12 months (%) (using MMT or QMT) at 12 months ‐ not measured
Methotrexate and azathioprine vs methotrexate (plus leucovorin)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in muscle mass at 6 months (%) ‐ not measured
Methotrexate and azathioprine vs methotrexate (plus leucovorin)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in handgrip strength at 6 months (%) ‐ not measured
Methotrexate and azathioprine vs methotrexate (plus leucovorin)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in timed walk at 6 months (%) e.g. 10‐metre or 6‐minute walk test at 6 months ‐ not measured
Methotrexate and azathioprine vs methotrexate (plus leucovorin)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Significant adverse events
Methotrexate and azathioprine vs methotrexate (plus leucovorin)
no estimate extracted1 study · 11 participantsUngraded

Oxandrolone compared to placebo for inclusion body myositis

Population: people with inclusion body myositis
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in muscle strength at 6 months (%)
Oxandrolone vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 16 participantsUngraded
Change in muscle strength at 12 months (%) ‐ not measured
Oxandrolone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in muscle mass at 6 months (%)
Oxandrolone vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 16 participantsUngraded
Change in handgrip strength at 6 months (%) ‐ not measured
Oxandrolone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in timed walk at 6 months (%) e.g. 10‐metre or 6‐minute walk test at 6 months ‐ not measured
Oxandrolone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Significant adverse events
Oxandrolone vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies