Cochrane · systematic review · CD001552

Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome

Lusa, V, Karjalainen, TV, Pääkkönen, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2024 · Cochrane Library

NeuromuscularAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
12
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 14.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 35.7%Low 1 · 7.1%Moderate 6 · 42.9%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Surgery compared to splint for carpal tunnel syndrome in the long term

Population: people with carpal tunnel syndrome
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Clinical improvement ‐ Long‐term improvement: > 3 months
Surgery vs splint
RR 2.1 [1.04, 4.24]3 studies · 210 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Symptoms (Boston CTS questionnaire) ‐ Long‐term improvement: > 3 monthsScale: 1 to 5, higher is worse
Surgery vs splint
no estimate extracted2 studies · 195 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Function (Boston CTS questionnaire) ‐ Long‐term improvement: > 3 monthsScale: 1 to 5, higher is worse
Surgery vs splint
no estimate extracted2 studies · 195 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain ‐ Long‐term improvement: > 3 months
Surgery vs splint
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health‐related quality of life (EQ‐5D) ‐ Long‐term improvement: > 3 months Scale: 0 to 1, higher is better
Surgery vs splint
no estimate extracted1 study · 167 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse effects
Surgery vs splint
RR 2.11 [0.37, 12.12]2 studies · 210 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Need for surgery or secondary surgery during
Surgery vs splint
RR 0.03 [0, 0.21]2 studies · 176 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias

Surgery compared to corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome in the long term

Population: people with carpal tunnel syndrome
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Clinical improvement ‐ Long‐term improvement: > 3 months
Surgery vs corticosteroid injection
RR 1.23 [0.73, 2.06]3 studies · 187 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Symptoms ‐ Long‐term improvement: > 3 months
Surgery vs corticosteroid injection
no estimate extracted2 studies · 118 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Function ‐ Long‐term improvement: > 3 months
Surgery vs corticosteroid injection
no estimate extracted2 studies · 191 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain (VAS) ‐ Long‐term improvement: > 3 monthsScale: 0 to 100, higher is worse
Surgery vs corticosteroid injection
no estimate extracted1 study · 123 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Health‐related quality of life ‐ Long‐term improvement: > 3 months
Surgery vs corticosteroid injection
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects
Surgery vs corticosteroid injection
RR 1.49 [0.25, 8.7]2 studies · 90 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Need for surgery or secondary surgery during
Surgery vs corticosteroid injection
RR 0.61 [0.25, 1.46]1 study · 163 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision