Cochrane · systematic review · CD001502
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non‐tubal infertility
Cantineau, AEP, Cohlen, BJ, Heineman, MJ, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
Gynaecology and FertilityAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 20%Low 4 · 80%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
IUI compared with FSP for non‐tubal infertility
Population: women with non‐tubal infertility
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Live birth per couple IUI vs FSP | OR 0.94 [0.59, 1.49] | 3 studies · 633 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Clinical pregnancy per couple IUI vs FSP | OR 0.75 [0.49, 1.12] | 14 studies · 1745 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Multiple pregnancy per couple IUI vs FSP | OR 0.62 [0.29, 1.32] | 7 studies · 908 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Miscarriage per couple IUI vs FSP | OR 1.07 [0.56, 2.05] | 7 studies · 884 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Ectopic pregnancy per couple IUI vs FSP | OR 0.88 [0.24, 3.19] | 4 studies · 643 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |