Cochrane · systematic review · CD000360

Assisted reproductive technologies for male subfertility

Cissen, M, Bensdorp, A, Cohlen, BJ, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

Gynaecology and FertilityAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
20
current version
GRADE rated
15
No studies
5
Included studies
NR
No studies 5 · 25%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 10 · 50%Low 5 · 25%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

IUI in natural cycles compared to TI in natural cycles for male subfertility

Population: couples with male subfertility
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth rate
IUI in natural cycles vs TI
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
OHSS
IUI in natural cycles vs TI
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Pregnancy rate per couple (all cycles)
IUI in natural cycles vs TI
OR 4.57 [0.21, 101.61]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

IUI in stimulated cycles compared to TI in stimulated cycles for male subfertility

Population: couples with male subfertility
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth rate per couple (all cycles)
IUI in stimulated cycles vs TI
OR 0.89 [0.3, 2.59]NRLow
Downgraded: imprecision
OHSS per couple
IUI in stimulated cycles vs TI
no estimate extractedNRLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Pregnancy rate per couple (all cycles)
IUI in stimulated cycles vs TI
OR 1.51 [0.74, 3.07]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Multiple pregnancy rate per couple
IUI in stimulated cycles vs TI
OR 3.15 [0.12, 79.69]NRLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Miscarriage rate per couple
IUI in stimulated cycles vs TI
OR 1.03 [0.19, 5.42]NRLow
Downgraded: imprecision

IUI in stimulated cycles compared to TI in natural cycles for male subfertility

Population: couples with male subfertility
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth rate per couple (all cycles)
IUI in stimulated cycles vs TI
OR 3.14 [0.12, 81.35]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
OHSS
IUI in stimulated cycles vs TI
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Pregnancy rate per couple (all cycles)
IUI in stimulated cycles vs TI
OR 3.14 [0.12, 81.35]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

IUI in stimulated cycles compared to IUI in natural cycles for male subfertility

Population: couples with male subfertility
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth rate per couple (all cycles)
IUI in stimulated cycles vs IUI
OR 1.34 [0.77, 2.33]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
OHSS
IUI in stimulated cycles vs IUI
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Pregnancy rate per couple (all cycles)
IUI in stimulated cycles vs IUI
OR 1.68 [1, 2.82]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Miscarriage rate per couple
IUI in stimulated cycles vs IUI
OR 1.06 [0.2, 5.63]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

IVF compared to IUI in natural cycles for male subfertility

Population: couples with male subfertility
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth rate per couple (all cycles)
IVF vs IUI
OR 0.77 [0.25, 2.35]NRLow
Downgraded: imprecision
OHSS
IVF vs IUI
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

IVF compared to IUI in stimulated cycles for male subfertility

Population: couples with male subfertility
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Live birth rate per couple (all cycles)
IVF vs IUI
OR 1.03 [0.43, 2.45]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
OHSS per couple
IVF vs IUI
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Pregnancy rate per couple (all cycles)
IVF vs IUI
OR 1.27 [0.33, 4.97]NRVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision