Cochrane · systematic review · CD000216

Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures in newborns with intraventricular haemorrhage

Whitelaw, A, Lee‐Kelland, R · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

NeonatalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 28.6%Moderate 2 · 28.6%High 3 · 42.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures compared to conservative treatment in newborns with intraventricular haemorrhage

Population: preterm infants less than three months of age with either: a) IVH demonstrated by ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) scan; or b) infants with IVH followed by progressive ventricular dilatation.
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hydrocephalus shunt
Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures vs conservative treatment
RR 0.96 [0.73, 1.26]3 studies · 233 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Death
Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures vs conservative treatment
RR 0.88 [0.53, 1.44]4 studies · 280 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Major disability in survivors
Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures vs conservative treatment
RR 0.98 [0.81, 1.18]2 studies · 141 participantsHigh
Multiple disability in survivors
Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures vs conservative treatment
RR 0.9 [0.66, 1.24]2 studies · 141 participantsHigh
Death or disability
Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures vs conservative treatment
RR 0.99 [0.86, 1.14]2 studies · 180 participantsHigh
Death or shunt
Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures vs conservative treatment
RR 0.91 [0.75, 1.11]3 studies · 233 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Infection of CSF presurgery
Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures vs conservative treatment
RR 1.73 [0.53, 5.67]2 studies · 195 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency