Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

775 questions in 58 reviews · Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma

current versions
No studies 166 · 21.4%Ungraded 24 · 3.1%Very low 356 · 45.9%Low 162 · 20.9%Moderate 47 · 6.1%High 20 · 2.6%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Rate of falls · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people experiencing 1 or more fall‐related injuries Measured using questionnaire data (self‐reported) · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1422 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people experiencing 1 or more fall‐related fractures Measured using questionnaire data (self‐reported) · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1422 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people experiencing 1 or more falls resulting in hospital admission Measured using hospital records · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7179 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Adverse events · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Cost‐effectiveness (economic analysis) · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Rate of falls Measured using questionnaire data (self‐reported) or hospital records · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4197 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Number of fallers Measured using questionnaire data (self‐reported) · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3047 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Number of people experiencing 1 or more fall‐related injuries Measured using healthcare centre records · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted67300 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Number of people experiencing 1 or more fall‐related fractures Measured using hospital injury record system · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted24365 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Number of people experiencing 1 or more falls resulting in hospital admission Measured using hospital records · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of fallers · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Adverse events · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from non‐randomised trials
Cost‐effectiveness (economic analysis) Measured using healthcare records · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted163683 participantsVery low
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people experiencing 1 or more fall‐related injuries · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people experiencing 1 or more fall‐related fractures · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people experiencing 1 or more falls resulting in hospital admission Measured using Danish Hospital Registration Database · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4542 participantsVery low
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of people who experienced 1 or more adverse events · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Medication or nutrition fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Economic analysis · community‐dwelling older adults ≥ 65 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Rate of falls Measured using questionnaire data (self‐reported) · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1422 participantsVery low
Multicomponent fall prevention interventions vs control: evidence from RCTs
Number of fallers Measured using questionnaire data (self‐reported) · community‐dwelling older adults at least 60 years of age
Population‐based interventions for preventing falls and fall‐related injuries in older people (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1422 participantsVery low
Surgical vs non‐surgical treatment
Number of participants sustaining recurrent patellar dislocationa · people with lateral patellar dislocation
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.55 [0.4, 0.75]8 studies · 438 participantsVery low
Surgical vs non‐surgical treatment
Knee and physical functiona Measured using the Kujala patellofemoral disorders scorea Scale from: 0 to 100 (higher scores = better function) · people with lateral patellar dislocation
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation (2023) · Cochrane
MD 5.737 studies · 401 participantsVery low
Surgical vs non‐surgical treatment
Adverse effects of treatment Overall incidence of complications · people with lateral patellar dislocation
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation (2023) · Cochrane
RR 2.21 [0.73, 6.66]2 studies · 144 participantsVery low
Surgical vs non‐surgical treatment
Patient satisfactiona Reported as 'good' or 'excellent'. · people with lateral patellar dislocation
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.74, 1.38]3 studies · 176 participantsVery low
Surgical vs non‐surgical treatment
Patient‐reported knee instabilitya Incidence of patellar subluxation · people with lateral patellar dislocation
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.5, 1.12]5 studies · 256 participantsVery low
Surgical vs non‐surgical treatment
Subsequent requirement for surgery (reoperations) for complicationsa Incidence · people with lateral patellar dislocation
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.45 [0.07, 2.73]3 studies · 195 participantsVery low
Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound vs control
Participant‐reported quality of life (medium term) QoL measured using SF‐36 PCS ranging from 0 to 100; high scores indicate better quality of life · acute fractures in adults; included studies assessed effects in complete upper limb fractures (distal radius,…
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 393 participantsVery low
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs control
Time to return to normal activities · adolescents and adults with acute fractures in tibia and femur
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs control
Time to fracture union · adolescents and adults with acute fractures in tibia and femur
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs control
Pain (medium term): using VAS (range 0 to 10); higher values indicate worse pain · adolescents and adults with acute fractures in tibia and femur
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 57 participantsVery low
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs control
Delayed or non‐union (medium term) · adolescents and adults with acute fractures in tibia and femur
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.56 [0.15, 2.01]1 study · 57 participantsVery low
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs control
Adverse events · adolescents and adults with acute fractures in tibia and femur
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound vs control
Quantitative functional improvement Using PROMs · acute fractures in adults; included studies assessed effects in complete upper limb fractures (distal radius,…
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound vs control
Time to return to normal activities (work) Number of days · acute fractures in adults; included studies assessed effects in complete upper limb fractures (distal radius,…
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 370 participantsLow
Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound vs control
Time to fracture union (days) · acute fractures in adults; included studies assessed effects in complete upper limb fractures (distal radius,…
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted11 studies · 887 participantsVery low
Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound vs control
Pain (short term): using VAS (range 0 to 10); higher values indicate worse pain · acute fractures in adults; included studies assessed effects in complete upper limb fractures (distal radius,…
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 148 participantsVery low
Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound vs control
Delayed or non‐union (medium term) · acute fractures in adults; included studies assessed effects in complete upper limb fractures (distal radius,…
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.25 [0.5, 3.09]7 studies · 746 participantsModerate
Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound vs control
Adverse events Reported as skin irritation · acute fractures in adults; included studies assessed effects in complete upper limb fractures (distal radius,…
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.06, 14.65]1 study · 101 participantsVery low
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs control
Participant‐reported quality of life · adolescents and adults with acute fractures in tibia and femur
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs control
Quantitative functional improvement · adolescents and adults with acute fractures in tibia and femur
Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Surgical vs non‐surgical management
Function in the short term · people aged over 14 years with displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Surgical vs non‐surgical management
Function in the long term Measured using AOFAS score (0 to 100, higher scores indicate improved function) · people aged over 14 years with displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 319 participantsLow
Surgical vs non‐surgical management
Chronic pain Measured as number of people experiencing pain · people aged over 14 years with displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.56 [0.37, 0.84]4 studies · 175 participantsLow
Surgical vs non‐surgical management
Health‐related quality of life (physical) Measured using SF‐36 (PCS) (score 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better physical HRQoL) · people aged over 14 years with displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 192 participantsLow
Surgical vs non‐surgical management
Return to work · people aged over 14 years with displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.26 [0.94, 1.68]5 studies · 250 participantsLow
Surgical vs non‐surgical management
Complications requiring unplanned return to theatre Subtalar arthrodesis · people aged over 14 years with displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.09, 1.53]3 studies · 657 participantsLow
Surgical vs non‐surgical management
Complications not requiring unplanned return to theatre Superficial infection (affecting only participants who had surgical treatment) · people aged over 14 years with displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fractures (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 847 participantsLow
Home fall‐hazard reduction vs control (e.g. usual care)
Rate of falls (falls per person‐years) · older people living in the community (included trials conducting pre‐ and/or post‐hospital discharge home visits…
Environmental interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community (2023) · Cochrane
Rate ratio 0.74 [0.61, 0.91]12 studies · 5293 participantsModerate
Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions vs usual care or attention control
Number of people who experienced 1 or more fall‐related fractures · older people living in the community
Environmental interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.22 [0.75, 2]2 studies · 976 participantsVery low